2006-07-25 08:32:49 · 15 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
is this the only answer they can give.
2006-07-25 08:33:40 · update #1
Yes David,it is their only answer.Too much Faux news.
-They cant stand the fact they cannot create a Clinton economy.
-All that is not right-wing blather is "liberal media".
It's why red states are finally turning blue.
People have had enough of the garbage.
2006-07-25 08:35:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is a finger pointing game, and the Clinton legacy really has bothered Republicans/Conservatives for a while (But not the President, who regularly calls on his dad and Clinton to be the US face to humanitarian efforts). Rush and Coulter and a lot of other conservative mouthpieces just don't like Clinton, believing him to really be the face of a leftist US coup. It's a little outlandish, but whatever.
If you want to know who the conservatives should really pile on, see the Boxer/Pelosi act. Between the two of them, I'm surprised you weren't required to write your question in ten languages before submitting it for UN approval.
The media is liberally biased, mainstream media at least. Which is fine, no one's got a gun to your head to listen to Air America or CNN or The NY/LA Times. Plenty of alternate info sources out there.
I think a patriot supports liberty and the defense of one's nation against external enemies and internal abetters. I think if you are alienating any American who would defend the nation tooth and nail, because you label them a 'liberal' or 'conservative', then you are looking to sell books, magazines, commercial time or something else.
We can't defeat external enemies by being internally fractured. So in that sense, both Air America and the EIB (Rush's Circus) are definitely divisive elements in the fight for the future of America. Neither does the nation any real good but being a vent for one extreme or the other.
We need to put down the petty differences and concentrate on responding to the assault on democracy and Judeo-Christian values that hampers Dems/Reps and everyone in between. Otherwise, you can be sure that Rush will be beheaded right alongside Randi Rhodes and Al Franken. Our enemy doesn't care about our internal divisions, except to exploit them, which they have masterfully.
2006-07-25 15:45:26 · answer #2 · answered by rohannesian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I won't blame Clinton or the liberal media... I will blame you and the rest of the ACLU loving imbeciles that don't understand what is at stake here! You have forgotten what personal responsibility is! You have a victicrat mentality which you wish to perpetuate!
Liberty Over Liberalism!
2006-07-25 15:37:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Billy-boy Clinton and his buddy alg'ore and Madeline Halfbright are responsible for North Korea's missle buildup and also responsible for the 1st Trade Tower bombing and all the other
terrorist attacks on Americans including the USS COLE
bombing and nothing was done about this because of pervert
Clinton playing footsie with Monica and as far as I am concerned
Clinton was responsible for 9/11, because of his inaction.
As for the commie news media, they have been accused of aiding and abetting the terrorists by letting them know what we are doing to stop any more terrorist attacks in this country.
The commie news media is also responsible for losses in VIETNAM>F the News Media!!!!
2006-07-25 15:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the question. If there is a question where Clinton or the media are relevant, then they are included in the answer. Ask me a question why don't you, and see how I answer.
2006-07-25 15:39:40 · answer #5 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some things are Howard Dean's fault. And Ted Kennedy. And John Kerry. And Hilary Clinton. And Al Gore. And Harry Reid. And Charles Schumer..............
2006-07-25 15:37:56 · answer #6 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As an avowed and staunch conservative, I proudly say, without hesitation, that you have it completely backwards. It's the liberal media first, and then Clinton (either one, and sometimes both).
2006-07-25 15:37:22 · answer #7 · answered by CigarMe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont blame things on Clinton.
2006-07-25 15:42:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why do liberals blame bush for everything, including things that happened before he became president? things like the recession he inherited, and like, the fact that bin laden was offered up to (his predacessor), and how Al Qaeda was plotting 9/11 for years under (you-know-who's) watch. oh, and that other president that did NOTHING in response to the first world trade center bombing...Not naming any names...
2006-07-25 15:44:05 · answer #9 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say it's because of the liberal media.
Or Clinton.
Hell, let's throw in Reagan, too.
And aliens.
Wait, what was the question?
2006-07-25 15:35:59 · answer #10 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋