thats true. clinton should have done something about that incident. he should have done better judgement and not think just because we sent a small missle that, that would scare them off. I may not agree with Bush Jr. but i agreed when he fought back because it shows that were not gonna just let some terrorist come into this country and do us in the ***. if i was president and that happened to me i would have done the same thing
2006-07-25 08:06:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Icys 2
·
7⤊
4⤋
The funny thing is..not only did Clinton do nothing but BUSH did nothing as well...Bush was in office for what..about a year when the attacks happend..he didnt so much as blink at the Taliban before that.
He even recieved a presidential daily brief entitled.."Osama Bin Laden Determined to Attack Within the United States" He received this brief in July. What did Bush do??? NOTHING.
And when the planes SLAMMED into the world trade and American bodies came falling out..and security told Bush "America is under attack"..what did Bush do....STILL NOTHING...but the funny thing is..you want to blame Clinton..you funny little fool. YOU are what's wrong with America. Idiots like bush wouldnt have a chance to destroy this country with out a few million bafoons to vote him into office.
2006-07-25 08:22:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by the man 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, 9/11 is not Bill Clinton's fault. The republicans had already shutdown the government on him and step him up with Monica as another distraction. He found Osama and unlike George W. they weren't behind him. Just remember the Bush's and the Bin ladin family have been involved with on another since the 70's. I guess that is just a coincidence to all the Bush and war backers. Support our troops and bring them home, so they can help fight the war on terror, our borders not oil rigs.
2006-07-25 08:47:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
richboy... can't you afford a better education?
we fired missiles at the bases in Africa... the bombings of the pharmaceutical factory were when we fired missiles at Iraq for violating the UN resolutions... that had nothing to do with the terror attacks...
your opinion is as false as your facts are...
you clearly don't know anything about the issue... you need to read and find out what exactly happened any why things happened... how about starting with the 9-11 report, which was a government filed report on 9-11... educate yourself before you make more of a fool of yourself...
using your theory... you could just as easily say that both Saddam and Ossama are a result of Reagan, when we armed and trained some of them in the 80s...
2006-07-25 08:18:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
9/11 was not Clinton's "fault". He would be what I term as an enabler.
He made it possible for 9/11 to happen through inaction.
I think if he'd not been so busy getting blow jobs and pretending to be black, that he may have been able to stop it, he did have Osama a few times, right there on a silver platter and didn't jump at the chance to take him.
Typical liberal. Too busy screwing around to actually do anything.
2006-07-25 07:53:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bill Clinton: Hey George... we've got this problem with Osama Bin Laden. He's determined to attack the U.S. ... or so I hear.
George Bush: Ok.... and where and when is this supposed to take place so I can put the DOD and DOJ on this???
Bill Clinton: Man I don't know that's just what I heard.
George Bush: Well what have you done so far with this information you are passing on to me???
Bill Clinton: Look dude... I'm just passing it on. Your'e in office now good luck.
George Bush: Wait... why didn't you accept custody of Osama when Sudan had him captured and offerred him to us???
Bill Clinton: (walking away) ... think I'm gonna go get me a Royale with cheese....
2006-07-25 09:33:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by jakobmccandles 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this Rush Limbaugh? Com'on. The Clinton administration merely had to handle the fallout from Dubya's daddy's Desert Storm. Even before Desert Storm - The Reagan years - Beirut, Lebanon, 200 or so Marines.
The/Any Republican Administration draws terrorism to foreign embassies and military sites like flies to doggy dumper party and like any other airborne virus this bird flu has come to America.
2006-07-25 08:07:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its Clinton fault for not killing Bin Laden, but it is Bush's fault for not paying attention to the terror threat warnings before 9/11 and not bringing Bin Laden to justice, I will give him till the end of his Presidency to get him. If he doesn't then his failure will be a disgrace to all that have lost their family members on 9/11. He promised him dead or alive and that's what we expect.
2006-07-25 07:59:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by DEEJay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wrong. Clinton could have and would have done much more if stupid people hadn't made such a big deal about the Lewinsky affair. That made it impossible for him to do what needed to be done. Clinton was one of the best presidents the US has ever had. I wish he was still in office.
2006-07-25 07:53:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
OH RIGHT! The Lewinsky affair kept the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES from making decisions to protect this country. I've heard all the excuses, now! But of course, blame it on President Bush! My God, it is frightening knowing that there are actually people out there that think this way. America, we ARE in trouble....and it's not Bush's fault!
2006-07-25 08:41:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by coco 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton wasn't the one who ignored the CIA warnings that Al Quaida would hijack planes and fly them into buildings.
And Clinton wasn't the one who sold arms to Afghanistan and Iraq.
2006-07-25 07:59:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by Kutekymmee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋