English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Its awful that many people look at the arabic resistance to Israel
policies as an anti-semitsm issue. as if the Arabs have to welcome the people who came from all over the world to steal their lands and their houses.and that Arabs have to accept also
that Israel keeps Jerusalim,Golan and west bank just to look good
to the rest of the world.
the arabs also have to forget massacres which were commited
in 1948 to force them to leave their villages and massacres which were commited in 1967 after 5 june war.
insteads of talking about all objective reasons that makes palestinians and Lebanese reject occupation just like the frensh did in the second world war.it is easier to make stupid theories
about anti-semitism,sick hatred twards jews (which lived in Arabic
countries before and after Israel was no troubles)
it's easier to talk about poor (God's Chosen People)who are hated
every where with no reason at all.
Will most of westerns remain emotionly biased for Israel forever?

2006-07-25 07:03:39 · 8 answers · asked by mohamed.kapci 3 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Mohammad, don't worry. Some of us actually know what happened.

I actually know that Jews and Muslims got along very well throughout most of Islamic history. Christian hatred for Jews has been longer lasting.

I'm sorry for your pain. This is a major injustice and it is very painful to me. Every time I see cute little Arabic kids running around I think of their cousins in Palestine and Lebanon. Unbearable sadness.

2006-07-25 10:11:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If you look at history at the macro level, you may come to the conclusion that most land in most of the world has been conquered, debased and then reconquered several times over. The land that is now Israel was once occupied by the Romans, the Arabs, the Mongols, the Christians. The land that we now call Lebanon and Palestine were occupied by many other nations many times.

So, who can say what land belongs to whom? Certainly, not a holy book. Religion is based on faith, not science or logic.

My conclusion is that the one who occupies the land at the present time is the rightful owner. The strongest shall lead. Currently, Israel is the strongest country in that neighborhood and will consequently occupy that land until a stronger nation takes over some time in the future.

Kings David and Soloman conquered that land at one point, so if we look back at that one small time period, the land belongs to Israel.

However, that land has been overrun several times since then. I believe that the Arabs occupied the land from 66 A.D. until 1948, but for a short time of Christian occupation.

So, does that mean that the Arabs can rightfully claim Israel as their own.

I think not.

2006-07-25 07:31:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It’s a fight between cousins.

Both Jews and Arabs claim Abraham as the first of their tribe. Both claim that God gave the land to Abe. Abraham had two sons.

Ishmael, the son of Hagar.
Isaac, the son of Sarah.

According to the Arabs, Abraham chose Ishmael as his heir.

According to the Jews, Abraham chose Isaac.

They have been fighting over the inheritance ever since.

Abraham should have had a good lawyer (probably a Jewish one, his mother is so proud) to draw up his will. Then the problem would have been resolved.

By the way, the international authority (UN) in 1948 partitioned the BRITISH Mandate into Israel and Palestine. (UNGA Res 181). So, according to international law, Israel does own that particular piece of real estate.

So, if you have any problems with the location of Israel take it to the UN.

2006-07-25 07:27:24 · answer #3 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0 0

Eventually you may realize that there is no bias. The arabs are in the wrong.

Who started the 6 day war? The answer? 5 arab countries attacked Israel at the same time, and lost....how do you think Israeli's feel about that?

The land the Jews are in now was a desolate wasteland with very few people. They made something of themselves there, under UN authority. Let's face it, your Islamic religion advocates the enslavement, conversion or death of all non believers. You don't believe in freedom, rights, or anything but your pig loving pedophile muhamud.

2006-07-25 07:20:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

What I certainly have under no circumstances understood is why the aspects are not directed to offering new residing quarters for refugees far off from the conflict. If human beings choose to die with no lead to sight over a plot of land(no count what the religious importance) it particularly is a regretful subject, yet do no longer stress it upon absolutely everyone.

2016-12-10 15:24:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

thats the 64,000 dollar question .AND know one kows the answer .if it happened more then a week ago it is not important .you must say israel kidnaped 10 soldiers and have there families on t.v. whining about how good these trained killers are so the whole world falls in love with them .TRAINED killer's is what the are fighting a war that has not ended since the theft of aabic land 58 years ago .

2006-07-25 07:25:36 · answer #6 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0 0

Because people are busy with Iraq and USA

2006-07-25 07:16:26 · answer #7 · answered by Be-hive Baaaby 3 · 1 0

I don't care. Just quit blowing up buses and trying to kill my family and everyone else in Western society.

2006-07-25 07:17:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers