Especially about Saddam Hussein and the Iraq conflict?
2006-07-25 06:53:59 · 21 answers · asked by brighteyes1701 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Like President Bush, he would be determined in his efforts to work to rid the world of Islamo-facists. Reagan didn't back down in the face of adversity. Proof positive: Calling another world superpower "The Evil Empire" even as they routinely pursued nuclear weapons. Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) brought about the end of the Cold War because he was unwilling to abandon it, even when the Soviets pressed him to. He was a man who didn't back down and like President Bush, he was a man of great resolve who would fight the terrorists until we were victorious.
2006-07-25 06:57:28 · answer #1 · answered by TakingStock 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Considering that he had Alzheimer's all the time he was in office.
He would probably think a bowl of ice cream would be nice.
I might be a Redpublican but G-d did not make me a fool Raygun was a man with a terminal illness it was very well hidden. This should be more of a testament to the RNC handling the president not a excuse to bully up a sick man.
Raygun heads should get it together. It was not Raygun that was the best president ever. It was the Redpublican Party was running the show that was the best ever. And that is something to be proud about.
Go big Red Go
2006-07-25 07:07:29 · answer #2 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not much has changed!!!
Reagan actually wanted to invade and conquer Iran!!!
But for political reasons, didn't.
Do we wish now he had wiped out Iran who is the head of the snake in that region.
Saddam was bad, but he made himself an open target attacking another COUNTRY. Terrorism is harder to pin down. We believe and have believed Iran is a terror sponsor, but try proving it!!!!
2006-07-25 06:55:15 · answer #3 · answered by Steve 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would try to take credit for something crazy like he tried to say he was the reason of the fall of Russia when it was already in progress when he came into office , which any President that would have been elected could have at that time. He was a terrible actor & President
2006-07-25 06:58:20 · answer #4 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he'd be proud of how Bush has stuck with Iraq and not abandoned them in their quest for freedom. I think he'd be optimistic that this would lead to more freedom in the middle east. I also think he'd be ashamed that we hadn't done more for Isreal.
2006-07-25 06:56:29 · answer #5 · answered by iahp_mom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd think he'd realize what it mistake it was to "cut and run" from Lebanon. Most of what is happening there right now is a direct result of our failure to deal with the terrorist when we had the chance.
2006-07-25 06:56:45 · answer #6 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he were alive, he probably wouldnt know the difference from the middle east and marmolade.
2006-07-25 06:57:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would grow the deficit just like he did in the 80s.
2006-07-25 06:56:01 · answer #8 · answered by Toddacanda 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think Ronald would have to defer all thinking to someone else. That's what he usually did.
2006-07-25 06:55:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like President "W", thinking was never his strong suit.
2006-07-25 06:56:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋