It literally sucks because both of these men have brought our nation to war.
2006-07-25 06:14:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Like father like son... besides... they are both bought by the same Saudi Oil money... I just wish I could be around in 100 years when the real historical account can disclose what morons they both are and just how evil they are.
2006-07-25 06:20:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would say Saddam and the terrorists brought the country to war. Both Saddam and the terrorists attacked our interests. Al-Qaeda, protected by the Taliban in Afganistan killed 3,000 of our citizens. Does anyone remember any of this stuff?
Saddam aslo attacked our aircraft every day. He also refused to comply with almost 30 of the conditions the U.N. set forth. Ring a bell? Clinton's philosophy was to just lob a couple bombs their way and hope for the best. When the Al-Qaeda attacked us in Somalia, we tucked tail, then it came back to bite us and the WTC. Oh you didn't know it was Al-Qaeda did you?
2006-07-25 06:25:55 · answer #2 · answered by madbaldscotsman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps for the same reason that Clinton bombed Iraq, Reagan had problems with Syria and Lebanon. Because the Middle East is an unstablereason filled with un-democratic dictatorships ruled by Muslim extremists
2006-07-25 06:18:36 · answer #3 · answered by LorgSkyegon 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Geez, people like you make me sick! You think these are the only 2 presidents in our history that have been at war? Kuwait asked for help when they were invaded, we helped. Then a radical middle eastern group ATTACKED OUR COUNTRY!! You obviously have not THOUGHT about it! There was a country once that attacked our military at home, not civilians but military and we nuked them! It sure wasn't a member of the Bush family that was president then! THINK ABOUT IT.
2006-07-25 06:28:41 · answer #4 · answered by ronrlogan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As an autonomous i will supply you my view. The President is already in charge for the collateral harm to the republicans who stood in the back of him in the previous the election. They lost their seats because of the fact maximum folk of human beings desire out of Iraq. the different shoe will drop next election whilst the democrats take the white residing house and lose greater seats in congress because of the fact the President is insisting on staying the direction no rely what. all people nevertheless status in the back of him and up for re-election is on a slippery slope. This one guy as President has accomplished greater harm on your occasion than all people i can remember in my over fifty years of residing. The GOP has lost its credibility.
2016-12-10 14:12:20 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
....and Johnson and Carter, as well as other dems didn't? Just like a liberal, you have selective, irresponsible memory. You seem to forget, the Senate (made up of democrats), Congress (made up of democrats) UNANIMOUSLY voted to send troops to Iraq and declare a war on terror. Geeeez, people, get it right! You think President Bush did this all by himself! Grow UP!
2006-07-25 06:22:27 · answer #6 · answered by coco 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the extremist Islamic fascist radicals have brought the war to us!
Wake up and get a clue!
Liberty Over Liberalism!
2006-07-25 06:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conveniently ignoring Clinton's war in Kosovo? Kennedy (a Democrat) got us into Vietnam. Your prejudice is obvious to everyone but you. Put aside your blind hatred and you may be able to see reality.
2006-07-25 06:18:49 · answer #8 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To understand that I suggest that you read the book called "Rule by Secrecy" by Jim Marrs also try www.prisonplanet.com or www.infowars.com
2006-07-25 06:19:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
THe Bush family is a nasty little corruption in our world and nothing good for HUMANITY has ever come from them.
2006-07-25 06:30:05 · answer #10 · answered by prancingmonkey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋