He certainly wouldn't have gone to war, thus supporting Osama's view that we are weak and decadent. This would have led to even more bombings of US and Western targets, and would have led to even more terrorists created, after they saw the success of al Qaeda, and the failure of the West to respond.
This has historical precedence, specifically the Nazis. Because of the peace-at-any-price feelings in Europe, and its willingness to appease any and all transgressions, with each success, Hitler became more and more powerful, more and more trusted, more and more revered. Annexation of Austria. Re-occupation of the Rhineland. Re-arming of the armies. Annexation of the Sudatenland (selling out the Czechs). With each sign of weakness and decadence and dishonor, Hitler's power became stronger and more entrenched.
This is exactly what happened to Osama after all of Clinton's failures to respond. He became bolder. And he gained more followers. And one would be hard pressed to imagine Al "Ice Tea Tinkle" Gore doing anything bold or patriotic, after his knee-pad toady support of all things Clinton.
He'd have been a disaster. Our economy would be in the dumpster, after the dual hits of the Clinton recession and the 9/11 economic aftershock, because Gore's masters would not support a tax cut, and Gore would never be able to inspire the nation's confidence.
We should all thank God every day that by the narrowest of margins, we were spared a Gore disaster.
Don't even get me started on the hollow traitor Kerry.
2006-07-25 06:18:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It would be a scary place. We would not be at war; we would be a target for all who wanted to extort us for food or money. Our economy would be in an all out depression because our taxes would be higher not lower, and our budget would be in the red just like it is now, but it would be to continue the welfare state that is known as Louisiana. Our troops would become targets as their hands would be tied and they would be under equipped like they were in Somalia, under Al Gore's boss. Neither one would take decisive action as J.F. Kerry proved when he flip flopped on every issue under the sun, including the war, and Al Gore proved unreliable when he made up the stories like inventing the internet. Cindy would not have a voice, she would still be the ostracized divorcee whose children dis-owned her and she would have no purpose in life. The international community would view us as a limitless contributor to the cause of the day, and the world’s police force with no real authority. It is unfortunate that all of us "red neck" conservatives must face the prospect of such times, but we survived Bill Clinton, and we will survive what ever the Liberals throw at us again. Thank god for President Bush, and I hope that the liberals who read this will realize that while you may think you know what's best for everyone, but the fact of the matter is that the individual makes the best choices for themselves, and that is at the core of the truly conservative agenda, freedom.
2006-07-25 06:42:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by wasp 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
911 would have definitely happened. It was in response to actions of Clinton, so nothing there would have changed, other than what the US did.
Gore would have imposed economic sanctions on both Afghanistan and Iraq. Al Quaida would have had a more free hand, and there would have been more 911 type attacks attempting to lift those sactions.
Also, the Kyoto Accord would be signed, so our countrie's energy policy would be run by a foreign institution. This would cause rolling brown-outs and black-outs as they shut down power plants they don't like before replacements can be built.
2006-07-25 05:59:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ricky T 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No matter if you want to argue if we would be in a war or if 9/11 ever would have happened the big difference would of been that we would still have a relationship with the rest of the world instead of shutting everyone out. They wouldn't have created such animosity towards the US. This go it alone attitude is unrealistic. Sooner or later we will need the international community by our side and with this administration we are alienating ourselves daily. Our country will always be better off with educated thinkers in charge other than a mindless cowboy!
2006-07-25 06:14:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Raw Dog 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We would have far more respect in the world,that you claim we would have "even less" shows you are a typical ignorant red-state hick who knows NOTHING about the world outside your own farmland.Hee-haw.
A Democratic president would have the guts to talk to Cindy when she wanted to ask why her son died,unlike Bush who was too much of a coward.A Democrat would at least provide a consise reason for going to war,as JFK did,so Sheehan wouldnt be looking for answers anyway.And what about the pickup truck
that moved over the crosses in the dirt.A republican was driving it so that makes it ok,right?
And Michael Moore is a "moron" because he exposed the rows of coffins of our dead men coming home becuase of Bush's useless war-for-oil.How much DO you really hate Americans?
2006-07-25 05:55:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In 2009 I attended a lecture in Australia with the aid of Derek Shearer, former US ambassador & Clinton consultant. In an casual Q&A consultation afterwards, he mentioned that Clinton had an IQ of around a hundred and eighty, yet that Gore made Clinton look like a retard. He additionally mentioned that the reason Gore lost the 2000 election (leaving aside the election fraud and cheating on the area of the Republicans) exchange into with the aid of fact whilst Bush is a moron with the IQ of a baked potato, he chanced on as a genial form of guy who individuals ought to think of going for a lager with, and concerning to. Gore, on the different hand, appeared & talked like a infant-kisser, and used vast words that made him sound pompous & incomprehensible to many people. So there you have it; a rustic with this form of extreme proportion of morons will oftentimes % a moron to lead it.
2016-10-08 07:32:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
With his profound interest in the environment, I think Gore would have taken better care of the American landscape.
He certainly wouldn't have lied to us about 9/11. I do not believe that we would be in Iraq if Gore were president.
2006-07-25 06:01:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Buffy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You would be better respected, as 90% of Britains hate George Bush but like america.
2006-07-25 05:58:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Octavius 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
More UN diplomats would be rich from the "OIl-for-Food" scam, we'd all be commuting in mass transit, all the Demohacks would be "flagwaving" as we apologize to the world for being American and the Taliban would have ambassadors in Washington.
2006-07-25 06:01:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This country will always be the only superpower. It doesn't matter whose the president. Have you seen Team America: World Police, it says alot.
2006-07-25 06:00:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rusty Shackleford 5
·
0⤊
0⤋