2006-07-25 05:49:04 · 17 answers · asked by lilmomma 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
nope, just be safe!
People really need to get their heads out of their asses. Its wrong because sex should be saved for marriage, you can get a std....blah, blah, blah. Trust me, not all marriages or people are so damn picture perfect. Marriage doesn't exclude you from getting a STD!!! Ask those poor folks who's spouse brought home herpes or aides. Please, running around in those rose colored glasses is more likely to lead you blindly into heartbreak and stupidity.
2006-07-25 06:17:47 · answer #1 · answered by gypsy g 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think there's anything wrong with it. I actually LIKE that you know EXACTLY what you want! I'm the same way. Right now, I'm not looking for a relationship, but hey, we all still got needs, right? I don't think it should be any different for a girl than it is for a guy. It goes back to that old double standard of it being ok for guys to further the population as much as possible, but girls are supposed to stay dainty and pure. Well...let's think about this folks...if guys are sleeping with any girl they can find, there's gotta be GIRLS willing to give it up to them, right? So, in reality, it's equal.
Be smart though. Use protection! :)
2006-07-25 12:55:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
One night stands serve their purpose. Sometimes you just want to have sex, no strings attached, no worries of a relationship to form, and that's what one night stands are there for. As long as you are safe, there is no harm in sharing just one night with a guy. One night stands can teach you a lot about yourself sexually. Sometimes you are more willing to let your inhibitions down when you are having sex with someone for one night only. You are more open to trying other things, and learning what you like and dislike. I say go for it, as long as you are not a person who gets very emotionally attached easily.
2006-07-25 13:44:01 · answer #3 · answered by cup_o_shina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do think it's wrong, i base that on experience too... i have had a couple of bad relationships, that have started with a sex lust... it's OK for a while, but I'm learning now that its better to find the right girl, and find love before lust.... it's hard going without sex right now, but it'll be worth it in the long run....
2006-07-25 15:06:58 · answer #4 · answered by engineer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really, as long as its protected sex. Just get a glance at his driver's license if you can though to see exactly who he is if you already don't know in case you need to trace something back to him after that night, lol. Some people in this world, you will totally fall in love with, others, you'll only be sexually attracted to. It's just something that happens.
2006-07-25 12:55:14 · answer #5 · answered by duvaldiva.com 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is wrong. Because God commanded in the Bible that sex is created to be in a marriage setting and only with your spouse. Another thing, it's kinda stupid, because you can get STD's and what not. You can become pregnant, yes, even if you were protection. I have heard of people getting pregnant and they were wearing protection! The only 100% protection is NOT having sex!! Have a nice day!
2006-07-25 13:05:48 · answer #6 · answered by ~~Catbird Woman~~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, sex should not be a recreational sport.... what about if you get pregnant or get a disease. I think sex should be only between two people in love not just for fun
2006-07-25 13:01:23 · answer #7 · answered by JustWant2B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing wrong with it, as long as your both responsible and safe. Enjoy!
2006-07-25 13:07:48 · answer #8 · answered by SAChicky 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you go girl, nothing wrong with enjoying yourself and making the most of youth !
2006-07-25 12:52:33 · answer #9 · answered by vicky l 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO! WHY TRY TO MAKE SOMETHING INTO MORE THAN WHAT IT IS. I WOULDN'T SUGGEST MAKING A HABIT OUT OF IT OR HAVING ONE WITH A COMPLETE STRANGER BUT WHAT CAN I SAY **** HAPPENS.
2006-07-25 13:00:49 · answer #10 · answered by telliebear42003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋