I am thinking of getting married to Awoman who has has her tubes burnt .however now she wants to have a baby with me...I was wondering if maybe invetro would work?? I don't know much about it but I guess I am just praying something could work
2006-07-25 04:57:31 · 11 answers · asked by kevin p 2 in Health ➔ Women's Health
How does the rest of her body look if a fire got all the way to her tubes?
Most women have their tubes tied, not burnt.
2006-07-25 05:01:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is having them burnt like having your tubes tied? I've never heard of this before. I know a woman can have a tubal ligation (tubes tied) reversed by having surgery to remove the clips. I've also heard of woman who have gone through invitro successfully. I have to ask though is this information going to be the difference between marrying this woman or not? If so, seriously consider weather you truly love each other.If you do, love overcomes any obstacle and you can't imagine living without her for any reason.
2006-07-25 05:09:46 · answer #2 · answered by kealey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She unquestionably can and that i've got seen it happen in the health center the place I artwork. A affected person had her tubes tied AND cauterized (burned) and have been given pregnant 2 years later. It became out to be an ectoptic (tubal), yet she exchange into pregnant notwithstanding.
2016-10-08 07:30:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A routine tubal litigation consists of only having the tubes tied. In my situation when they saw inside my reproductive system, my fallopian tubes had many holes and severe scar tissue from several etopic pregnancies. They had to cut and burn my tubes. I can NEVER get pregnant again. You may want to clarify with your girlfriend exactly what took place during the procedure.
2006-07-25 05:05:16 · answer #4 · answered by Dee Dee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as long as this woman is still ovulating, she could have a child. yes, it may involve several treatments with infertility drugs, invitro fertilization, or other drastic measures, but it is possible. if she had a tubal ligation with cauterization, she must have been very sure that she didn't want any more children, so you should both think a lot about this decision and talk it over extensively before committing yourselves to the frustration and expense of possible failed procedures.
2006-07-25 05:37:10 · answer #5 · answered by cola2sweet4words 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are procedures that can undo the damage to the tubes with limited success. As long as she has a healthy undamaged uterus, she could be a very good candidate for invitro. Invitro is expensive though.
2006-07-25 05:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by petlover 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She can't have kids! If her tubes have been clipped and or burnt, then her book is closed! NO more babies. You might have to consider adoptions or maybe finding a surrogate mother.
2006-07-25 05:02:35 · answer #7 · answered by CTargrl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Invetro is the only option. That is $14,000 in most states.
2006-07-25 05:01:17 · answer #8 · answered by Daddy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now days tubes are tied clipped and burned...Invetro could work as she still produces eggs they would have to be harvested and implanted inito her uterus..This is expensive...
2006-07-25 05:46:41 · answer #9 · answered by *bossy* 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
getting tubes tied disrupts the delivery of the egg to the uterus. all other functions remain unchanged
2006-07-25 05:01:35 · answer #10 · answered by randy072760 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋