It's a tie between these two. If they somehow made it onto the same broadcast, I think I might go into seizures.
2006-07-25 18:47:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Tim McCarver!
When he speaks he seems to have forgotten he made the final out of the 1968 WORLD Series (popping out to Bill Freehan. Thereby giving The Tigers the win after being down 3 games to 1).
2006-07-25 13:56:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Joe Morgan, if only because Tim McCarver at least watches a lot of games.
If you listen to the number of times Joe Morgan says, "Well, I haven't seen enough of him/them to really comment," it's pretty amazing. You'd think part of an analyst's job would be to watch games, but not Joe!
2006-07-25 05:30:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Craig S 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Both are awful to listen to but McCarver keeps coming at you with that annoying accent belaboring the same point over and over again. Morgan does that too but he's a little more subdued. I vote McCarver.
2006-07-25 04:50:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by ammy2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tim McCarver is funnier and watching and listening to Joe Morgan is like listening to my dad. So if I had to pick, Morgan is the worse.
2006-07-25 04:52:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by USC Fan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
McCarver
2006-07-25 04:53:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by cubscaps33 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I vote for Tim McCarver he is repetitious to the point of being ridiculous, not informative
2006-07-25 04:54:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tim McCarver is a buffoon.
2006-07-25 09:49:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, I really dislike both of them, but I would say Tim McCarver, he just rubs me the wrong way...
2006-07-25 06:58:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by -- 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate Tim McCarver!!!
2006-07-25 05:39:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by LL Cool J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tim McCarver or maybe you create a noise pollution!
2006-07-25 04:57:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋