2006-07-25 03:37:37 · 12 answers · asked by marcel7023 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
They should. But it won't happen
2006-07-25 03:40:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Can you imagine how these little dictators would act up if they didn't have the concern that their whole country could become a piece of glass in hours if they really piss us off.
Sad to say but it is true, those nukes some heavy duty peace keepers.
The world without nukes would be like a club without bouncers.
2006-07-25 03:45:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say go for it generally but we all know the impending outcome. Just because we say so doesn't mean it will happen. I don't think the problems are the bombs it is the people that have them. I think this can be summed up with a quote "Guns don't kill people, stupid motherfu**ers with guns kill people." Just replace guns with bombs. I don't remember where that quote came from though.
2006-07-25 03:44:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has always been a fantastic idea since its invention. However. Can you really imagine all the heads of nuclear nations agreeing to that. Most of them don't trust each other.
No matter how idealistic it may seem. I think that it will never happen.
2006-07-25 03:43:38 · answer #4 · answered by JeffE 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a great idea.
Any head of state who wishes to go to war should be put on Gruiniard island, along with others who wish to destroy human life, and left to their own devices. Let them fight it out amongst themselves in isolation. No-one should be allowed to leave the island once they have shown themselves to be psychopathic by the action of calling for war.
2006-07-26 09:07:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, because some terrorist group or rougue nation will eventually build one in secret and if there is no deterrent keeping them from using it then they could cause some serious damage.
They have a thing keeping people who dont have them now from getting them. its called the NPT. all the other countries who have them now are cutting back but we still need some just in case
2006-07-25 03:43:12 · answer #6 · answered by sexydp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What an awful idea. You'll be asking for world peace next.
2006-07-25 03:43:35 · answer #7 · answered by Stammerman! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
me ban the bomb world wide dude
2006-07-25 03:40:51 · answer #8 · answered by BRAVEHEART 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tried once. See source.
2006-07-25 03:40:42 · answer #9 · answered by Brian L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree, we all would have a better future. We have no use for such a weapon.
2006-07-25 03:41:40 · answer #10 · answered by nocateman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes but would you trust the yanks actually would get rid of them?
2006-07-25 03:45:24 · answer #11 · answered by China9 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋