Should terrorists be given death penalty or not?Give reasons in support of your answer.?

Answer 1

It is a fact that the death penalty is more costly than locking someone up for even the rest of his life.
This is since in the case of the death penalty legal procedures are especially costly, once you execute someone you cannot undo it.

It is pretty unclear whether death will deter terrorists, many of whom die for their cause anyways, like the 9/11 hijackers.

Having terrorists alive and in prison does not give them a heroic/martyr status but shows that the US as a civilization is above their primitive logic.
Also terrorists, like other killers, often grow wiser as they grow older. They may come to regret their actions and actually call upon others from prison to stop doing the same they did.

Germany for example never executed any of its Red Army Faction terrorists that hijacked Lufthansa planes and killed politicians starting in the 1970s. Most of the surviving terrorists by now have given up violence and publicly rejected it. The Red Army Faction dissolved itself in the nineties. Many former terrorists even have been released and did never harm anybody again.

Is this just to the victims? No. Nothing is just to the victims. Society must use whatever is effective and moral to defend itself. And history suggests that if you strike back very hard you increase the terrorists' prestige and status. A state takes them seriously as enemies, rather than the petty crazy people they are. A strong response is exactly what the terrorists want, I mean when they hit they want wide media coverage and they want the president to mention them directly in his speeches. They want to influence and control policy.

Answer 2

Terrorists gave the death penalty to the 3000 people who died on 9-11 plus the thousands more they have taken thru out the years. the only way to beat them is to kill them, by whatever means we can, thru war or thru the Justice system.We need to show them that they will pay the price for there actions. Now granted most of them do not care if they are killed because it makes them a martyr for there cause. But if the next generation of terrorists see that there work is in vain and they are dyeing for nothing, maybe they will wise up and to stop.

Answer 3

The death penalty is WRONG. When I was "non-vegan" I did not see it as wrong, like most people who side with the DP ~ I was sickened and felt the bloody notion of REVENGE.

Now in the name of DEFENSE well it is one thing to kill, I mean take the movie 12 monkeys where "cole"(played by BRUCE) had to clock those "street thug rapists" off the back or Reilly(played by stowe)~ you see that was killing in the line of defense.

The death penalty is sort of like those police brutality footages that they show where they have the "perp" in custody and then they beat the perp. or do other out of line things to him/her.

To adminster something such as the DEATH PENALTY, well you are really no different than the "murderer" who you dress up against. And remember this how do you know if the "accussed" is really the one to blame or not?

Answer 4

I feel the death penalty should be used a lot more, including terrorists. I am quite tired of paying all these tax dollars for these criminals to be babysat in prison for thirty years or longer. Kill them and save the US a billion dollars.

Answer 5

Yes.

Why should our hard-earned tax dollars support them in jail for the rest of their lives? Why should we pay to house them, feed them three meals a day, make sure they have clean linens, make sure they have items for recreation?

If they're found in our country, kill 'em. Legally, of course.

EDIT for the person below:
http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/DP.html#D.Cost

"Cost of Life Without Parole: Cases
Equivalent To Death Penalty Cases
1. $34,200/year (1) for 50 years (2), at
a 2% (3) annual cost increase, plus
$75,000 (4) for trial & appeals = $3.01 million
2. Same, except 3% (3) = $4.04 million
3. Same, except 4% (3) = $5.53 million

Cost of Death Penalty Cases
$60,000/year (1) for 6 years (5), at
a 2% (3) annual cost increase, plus
$1.5 million (4) for trial & appeals = $1.88 million
Same, except 3% (3) = $1.89 million
Same, except 4% (3) = $1.91 million"

The death penalty is less costly over the years - if common sense wasn't enough to tell you that, perhaps this link will help.

Answer 6

i do no longer help it for many motives, yet that's the main compelling. human beings are fallible and, no count how complicated we attempt to eliminate the threat of executing an harmless individual, it is going to never circulate away. homicide expenses are larger in states (and otherwise comparable international locations) that have the dying penalty than in those devoid of it. As for deterrence, it has never been shown to be any further effectual in deterring ability criminals than different punishments. for individuals without a judgment of right and incorrect, the superb deterrent is the phobia of being caught. existence devoid of parole additionally keeps the worst criminals off the streets. It ability precisely what it says. Its important earnings: If we locate an harmless individual in reformatory he could properly be released.

Answer 7

That depends on what type of terrorist.

Overall i would say yes, an eye for an eye.

But especially in the case of religious fanatics. Why? Becasue there is no point in locking them up. There is absolutely no chance of rehabilitating them. How can you rehabilitate someone who believes that kiling in the name of their religion is right? Anything you say is automaitcally a lie to discredit their faith.

Answer 8

No because the death penalty is the most horrifying act of legal human murder.

Answer 9

I understand the fact that they would be punished for taking other lives but at the same time, do we have a say on whose life we take for the sake of terrorism.

Answer 10

Nelson Mandela was listed as a terrorist.