God! This is like that question: "If you were stood up to your neck in sh*t and someone chucked a bucket of sh*t at you, would you duck or not?"
2006-07-25 01:13:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by ^~^ Dracula's bottom set 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
President Condoleeza Rice and vice chairman Hilary Clinton! President Hilary Clinton and vice chairman Condoleeza Rice! you're making the alternative! the two way i'm hoping one or the different happens.
2016-11-02 23:08:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by powelson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm not an american (thank goodness) so I wouldn't be voting anyway. However, it seems to me that neither of them would be any different from everything that has gone before. The trouble is that the US spends most of its education budget on convincing the people that they've been "well educated" when in fact, tho opposite is true. It still seems to be the case that a college degree in the US is somewhat easier than an English GCSE. Perhaps the Americans ought to first improve the education of the general public - dangerous because then they'd be able to think! Then look for a potential president or two from the intellectually superior members of their society. Of course, the primary problem is that they should never have overthrown our benevolent rule. Perhaps we should send in the gunboat :-)
2006-07-25 02:06:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by rationalist 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like Hilary Clinton and i think she would make a good president. Condoleeza Rice is just another Bush.
2006-07-25 01:13:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by liam 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well,Both of them are not my favourites.But I would like change and hence would like Condi Rice to take the mantle as America needs to carry on with the "War On Terror".If Hillary is gonna come u might well see the recurrence of 9/11 altho in another city.
2006-07-25 02:31:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What I want 2 know is how Ricey ended up being called DR?
Since when?
I have no admiration 4 either,
Y won't Rice PUBLICLY Denounce Israel?
No, I have no time 4 either of the Old Bats!
2006-07-25 02:16:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't like Hilary, or what I do know of this topic, but how is it that (above) she couldn't HANDLE her own marriage? How was her husband cheating on her, her fault. Do you really know how often she gave her hubby head? Maybe she did it all the time, and he just liked Monica as a power trip to see if he could get away with it...Wow not a good reason to give when you are not that bug on the wall to see how she really did HANDLE her marriage...eewww
2006-07-25 01:23:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hilary
2006-07-25 01:13:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by ARVINDER D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dont know much about Condi Rice and how she would be as a leader. Hillary seems to be a strong force and think she was a strong force behind Bill so will say Hillary just because i know more about her.
2006-07-25 01:14:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by MissBehave 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably Clinton, but I don't think the country is quite ready for a woman president. You know we are still caught up in the good ole boy syndrome
2006-07-25 01:14:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Granny 1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary
2006-07-25 01:12:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋