Should everyone who doesn't agree with Dubya be sent to live in a concentration camp in Afghanistan?

Question

Or perhaps Israel, Iraq or Lebanon? I was surprised to see some people posting this kind of suggestion. If I were black would they want to send me back to Africa?

Playtoofast - your rhetoric is just a thin cover for your belief which apparently is that anyone who does not agree with Bush should be sent to a concentration camp in a horrible place "for the greater good." You are really a Nazi.

Answer 1

No. We live in America and therefore have been afforded the right to disagree with our elected leaders. We may even stand up, protest his name, insult him, or otherwise do something of explicit nature and still be free to do so.

We have rights guranteed to us by the Constitution. While I find it dishonorable to disagree with the President, it is every citizens right to do so.

God Bless the USA. The land of the free, and the home of the brave.

Answer 2

I think Bush should be sent to a concentration camp, and considering only about 30 pecent of the people support him you'd be sending 70 percent of Americans to a concentration camp and I would be one of those so no I don't agree with this

Answer 3

I dont think anyone should be put in concentration camp at all and I am pretty conservative. However, its too bad rhat those who criticize Dubya cant see how they live in other countries like Afghanastan and other oppressive countries. They might gert a better perspective on what we are trying to do.

Answer 4

IT's not one of those thing's polite people bring up in conversation.
WE often must place people who fail to conform with the normal view's society accepts away from the rest of us so we may enjoy the life we were all ment to live.
You confuse justice for all with those who would spoil and destroy that which holds the fabric of our community together .
WE often make the hard choice to remove those around us who would seek to do us harm and who naturaly reject the common rules of man everyone must follow.
Would you allow people who at some point have the capaciity to do great harm to our family and fiend's just roam free knowing that at some point they will greatly harm the live's of those around them .
SOMEtimes we must look at the individual and for society's own good it is incumbent on us to remove them from people who have accepted a proper and justified order in which all function well .
If it were not for those people who would spoil our goals and damage our property there would be no need to place them outside our community and as such placing them away from us is the alternative to there permenent demise.
SHOULD they at some point come to accept the truth's of the people there is the possibility they might be given another oppertunity to rejoin society and contribute to the health of all the people.
WE must break the spirit of these people inorder for them to become productive member's of our society and that there contributions outway the care we must provide for them as people of somewhat lower capacity to function without causing harm to the people who make america great.

Answer 5

No, they should be given a medal for refusing to follow the rantings of an idiot! Only people of limited intelligence could possibly still defend him.

Answer 6

Whoever said such a dumb thing is stupid.

But why bring up the subject? It's not worth thinking or bothering about because it is a stupid idea from a stupid person.

Is this such a burning issue?

Answer 7

Well, this is the perfect forum for running at the mouth with the brain disengaged! So political commentary will follow.

Answer 8

Nope just the terrorists. Sounds like you need to get packing.

Answer 9

No, I think that the ones that agree with him should be on the front lines in Iraq!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 10

People are so ignorant.