My guess is because of invadeing a land that does not belong to them ? I think the 73 egyptian victory over israel , was becuase israel took over sinai few years back ??
or am I wrong ???
2006-07-25
00:13:25
·
6 answers
·
asked by
interested
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
if we are to assume that muslims want to destroy israel , then how come jews have livied in peace and were integrated in thier socities for ages without any sort of conflict , they even married from muslim men and women?
2006-07-25
00:26:04 ·
update #1
Yes, since its creation with the help of England and allies, Israel has invaded the region, evicted thousands of people already living there, and oppressed them all. They have rallied support for their misguided cause from the West, who are religiously associated with them (as Judeo-Christian). All these wars occurred because the people who had an actual right to live in the area were pissed that suddenly these other people stole their lands. You might say that hey, that land is holy land for the Jews. However, I might as well say that it's just as holy for the Muslims who had already been living there. It's not like Judaism is more legitimate than Islam.
The only reason Israel is still in existence is because Western countries have given them billions of dollars in support. I think that they support Israel either because they think that the Jewish religion is more legitimate or (unfortunately) that the white skin of Israelis is superior to the dark skin of Palestinians, etc. They're wrong though, and it's very unjust for Israel to still be there.
What the Israelis ought to do is move out of where they are now and establish a state in a place where people are willing to give them land. It's not like they have a right to be there; just because Western countries tell them they could be where they are now doesn't mean they should be there. Indeed, anyone with a brain will resist them. Even Theodor Herzl, the man who started the Zionist movement that wanted to make a state for European Jews, suggested that they go to Australia instead of this holy land. So I'm sure that although Israel shouldn't be around there anymore, the Israelis can live on, and should move to a different place.
Then again, I doubt anything will change. Israel will continue masquerading with its so-called superiority to the people who actually have a right to be there. (You can go even further by saying that even before ancient Israel was made, the Israelis invaded the region and drove out the people living there such as Canaanites.) And the corrupt West will continue to support it. I'm against both sides of the conflict, but I don't think Israel belongs there; indeed, the three wars that you mentioned prove that at least some people agree with justice.
Note: to address your question about Jews peacefully integrating for a long time with Muslims in the area, that occurred before the Jews actually made a country. That is, before Israel was created and they stole the lands of the Palestinians. Before, there was peace because the Jews did not force Muslims out of their homes so that more Jews could come and occupy the new state of Israel. Before, there was peace because England and its allies did not give money, weapons, and approval to Jews to have their own state. The misguided existence of Israel in that specific place is the cause of all this war. Indeed, they can disband the state and simply go back to integrating with Muslims, but that may not happen peacefully anymore because how can the Palestinians suddenly make peace with a people who slapped you in face and stole your land? I think the best bet would be to just make a different Israel state in Australia or someplace like that. Again, I doubt this would happen though, because the Israelis are confident that they will wipe out the Muslims with the help of the West and that they don't have to look for peace. It's very sad.
2006-07-25 00:27:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Captain Hero 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ever since Israel has been created it has been her neighbors that have attacked Israel...not the other way around. When the palestinians were offered 50% of the land as part of the Balfour Agreement in 1948 they rejected it and chose to fight for it. They lost, and have since been backed by the Arab neighbors to consistently attack Israel. Egypt has never beaten Israel in war, and in fact it was after the 6 day war that Israel actually obtained the Sinai....which was given back to Egypt as part of a peace plan.
2006-07-25 07:36:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by jpxc99 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The land has been theirs since about 1500 BC. They were pushed out by groups most recently the Turks. There were still some Israelis living there when the vast number returned after losing there homes in WW2.
Almost all the wars were because their muslims neighbors wanted to destroy them. When and if they took land it was the result not the cause and for defense to create a buffer.
2006-07-25 07:19:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lupin IV 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes you are wrong...the west bank and the sanai were the reward accepted, resultant to the decimation of the Egyptian and Syrian forces. They were under attack even before that particular war. They have been under attack ever since they returned to Israel in 1948.
Perhaps a little history studies may cause you to become aware of what has been taking place there, over the past decades. Seems you have been guided in a pretty backward direction.
2006-07-25 07:43:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A viable Palestine means a viable Israel and no viable Palestine means no viable Israel and wars go on between the two people.
No one could NOT change his mind unless he has no mind.
Occupying other people by force is losing policy in the past and now and has no future.
2006-07-25 07:28:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bad administration and clintonesque nature of politicians.
2006-07-25 07:18:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by savio 4
·
0⤊
0⤋