Our culture is all about "MY" rights. Babies get in the way of that. Plus, did we mention the abortion industry is a multi-million dollar industry at least? abort73.com though, good website.
2006-07-24 21:45:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Last I heard, a woman can't get pregnant by herself. The last time that happened, a star shown in the East.
Until men start having the babies too, it's a woman's choice on what she wants to do.
If she can live with her choice, what gives anyone else the right to interfere?
Particularly since I haven't heard or read of a single PRO LIFER helping an unwed mother, or a rape victim, nor incest victims, with their pregnancies nor their children after they are born.
I do, however, hear and read a lot about mothers leaving their babies on dumpsters, at police stations, churches and fire stations.
Some of those defenseless babies were crying more loudly than you obviously are, and they're in the land of the living!
2006-07-27 00:39:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by classyjazzcreations 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not ALL feminists are pro-abortion/anti-life/pro-choice.
But it's been a legal right to have an abortion, (or multiple ones) for over 20 years now.
Do read the history of Margaret Sanger to get info. about how it all started in the U.S.A. and what the rest of Planned Parenthood's motto: "Every Child A Wanted Child" actually says. Today, most pro-choice proponents would be surprised!
2006-07-24 21:52:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by LL 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I consider myself a feminist, but would never kill a baby. Some women think that because the baby is in their body that they should have the right to kill it. Well, they allowed a penis to be put in their body so I think they lose on that part. I also think that since feminism started with the idea that women should be equal to men that men need to play a bigger part in the debate as well. My boyfriend got his girlfriend in high school pregnant, and he didn't find out until after the fact that she had an abortion. It has haunted him ever since, that he had another baby and it was killed with no say from him.
2006-07-24 23:52:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Del 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I consider myself as feminist but i would NEVER kill a baby. A baby is a human being as me and you, and i bet that you would not kill another person because of the simple fact that you would get punish right? In other words: JAIL! Those women that kill their babies are insane because the baby can't defend himself and has no voice of his own! The best thing they can do is stop being such a whore and try as hard as you can to keep your legs close! Many women say they've been raped (sorry if someone gets offended,but you know what? get a life and shut the hell up cuz we're talking about abortion) and want to abort their babies, but if they've been victims of such an horrible crime, why do they wanna be part of another horrible crime themselves? Best thing to do is to put your baby in adoption. That way you won't become in a murder yourself and make the baby and his future parents happy!
2006-07-28 16:47:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Confused Chick 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
honestly you want to take into context of what changed into occuring in Russia, which managed Uzbekistan, on the time. there changed into type war occurring and many men changed into killed or imprisoned on the time. "interior the overdue 1920s, the time period changed into taken up and switched over by using youthful communist cultural militants who sought the party leaders' popularity of an attack on "bourgeois hegemony" in subculture; it fairly is, on the cultural institution, which include Anatoly Lunacharsky and different leaders of the human beings's Commissariat of Enlightenment, and the values of the old Russian intelligentsia. For the militants, the essence of cultural revolution changed into "type war" - an attack antagonistic to the "bourgeois" intelligentsia interior the call of the proletariat - and they meant the "revolution" component to the time period actually. interior the years 1928 by ability of 1931, the militants succeeded in gaining the party leaders' help, yet lost it lower back in 1932 even as the crucial Committee dissolved the significant militant corporation, the Russian association of Proletarian Writers (RAPP), and promoted reconciliation with the intelligentsia
2016-11-25 22:41:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by lacy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Mommy has a right to a choice and a decent quality of life too.
2006-07-24 21:45:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr X 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because the women who have abortions are mostly (not all) selfish and unable to take responsibility for their action. If they didn't want a baby, they should keep their pants on.
2006-07-25 03:46:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by CAPTAIN CONSERVATIVE 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because feminists are evil little twits who don't actually care about anything beyond their own comfort.
2006-07-24 22:06:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by DNE 3
·
0⤊
2⤋