2006-07-24 21:39:32 · 5 answers · asked by Rylan N 1 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Maintenance & Repairs
two versions of the same plant.
2006-07-25 17:45:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bio-diesel is totally part of the answer. The Bush backing of corn for ethanol is basically ridiculous simply by very large ability expenses in generating corn. making use of food generating land is likewise basically ridiculous. notwithstanding, plant waste should be utilized to create ethanol and fertilizer mutually. also, animal barns produce a lot of methane which should be accrued and used on the farm as gas for automobiles, electric powered turbines, heating etc. Methane is 26 cases a warming gas than C02 so we ought to continuously be burning it. Bio-diesel should be basically synthetic on your own storage from waste eating position oil. the finished fix will require many alternative guidelines. Hydrogen is an decision decision it is up and coming. study is displaying us more cost-effective and low-cost innovations to produce hydrogen. I push for inner combustion engines because in less warm climates we favor the nice and cozy temperature in our automobiles. For southern climes electrics can be a sturdy decision as batteries artwork poorly in chilly and optimally in warm.
2016-10-15 09:45:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You gonna run the exhaust back into the cab?
2006-07-24 21:46:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes but that would be like turning gold into lead.
2006-07-26 05:00:23 · answer #4 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what a waste of raw material...
2006-07-24 21:42:46 · answer #5 · answered by jugular_vein 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋