English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Clinton Kelly and Stacy London are good hosts, but what they do, Susannah Constantine and Trinny Woodall do much, much better. I like the angst and attitude of the original, something the TLC show lacks.

2006-07-24 21:20:54 · 4 answers · asked by wackyguy 3 in Entertainment & Music Television

4 answers

The Whole original show was built around the know-how and good eye for shapes and figures of Trinny and Susanna. Their personalities makeit what it is. Therefore any copy will never be the same.

It is the same with any attempt at reproducing the success of a format without the people who made it a success in the first place.

2006-07-26 04:09:51 · answer #1 · answered by aggrieved_aussiette 2 · 0 1

It's like most American shows which rip off the BBC ones (ie The Office) While they might be good in their own right, they're never AS good. I guess part of it is b/c they tend to still allow "real" ppl on British television. In the US it's not common to see ppl with real personalities (or even real body parts lol).

Btw, I love Stacy and Clinton ~ they're both sweet and hilarious, but they're probably not able to do much based on the show's restrictions. God... remember the first guy they had as the host?? LOL Now that was baaaaad.

2006-07-24 21:33:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Any copy is never as good as the original.

2006-07-24 21:24:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because the BBC guys would catch on fire.

2006-07-25 04:15:52 · answer #4 · answered by SoccerClipCincy 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers