Is it true that a major portion of the earnings that of Arabs, is being diverted to nourish the terrorist activities, especially from the GCC? Why the Arabs are scattered and don't have the unity? Why Palestine youth are attracted towards violence instead of non-violence?
2006-07-24 21:02:26 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Rubi, once our land was occupied by the Great Britain and we got the freedom through the non-violence i.e. on August 15th, 1947 India got freedom. A lot of people were killed during those days, even worst than today what Palestine people are suffering today.
2006-07-24 21:29:15 · update #1
If Palestine were to be led by a Ghandi-like pacifist, AND a majority of people followed him or her, then even the USA and Israel would not be able to withstand the political force.
But I doubt that the spirit or will to peace is that strong anywhere in the Middle East.
I am sorry to say that the Palestinians just don't strike me as sophisticated enough to understand how brilliant a strategy that would be.
Maybe if they were Christians, Hindus or Buddhists, but Islam is not a pacifistic faith.
2006-07-31 10:10:49 · answer #1 · answered by aka DarthDad 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
My friend who is a Palestinian told the truth to me, whose is 2nd generation Palestinian.
He said, "There are no real Palestinian people they are all really nomads and they became called Palestinians after 1948. They are actually from Nomads that traveled in the parts of Iraq, Iran, etc. and not from Israel or what is called Gaza. "
We need to give them a homeland back where they came from (Iraq, Iran, Etc.) but the Arabs don’t want this if they do they have to give up there oil fields in the new area for these nomadic people aka Palestinians
He does not trust the Arabs at all spits on the ground when he hears the name.
Let give them back Iraq Iran etc and help them out of "Gaza" Then there may be more peace, not perfect peace but more peace then there is now
2006-07-31 11:23:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A bomb only hurts a few, but causes ill will.
A non violent sit in would turn the focus to the more serious issues of how to achieve co-operation and how to make a future together.
A better plan than bombs would be to insist that the Jews help all Palestinians achieve a comparable standard of living within a single generation, as the neighborly requirement of sharing the land of your JOINT forefathers.
2006-07-24 21:10:41 · answer #3 · answered by PlayTOE- 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some people just like to fight. The schools there teach hate. Some of the gangs in the US are the same way. Besides the US's left wing also preaches hatred of the US & Israel.
2006-08-01 13:37:12 · answer #4 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of fact India became the Jewel interior the crown of the British Empire and the non violent protests the final Viceroy Earl Mountbatten became sent to india to offer her Independence with Dignity yet did no longer gain a non violent partition lots to his unhappiness. together with his solid friendship with Jawaharlal Nehru and amicable kin with Mahatma Gandhi yet lack of ability to artwork his nicely-regular charm on Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Mountbatten immediately gave up wish of salvaging a unified self reliant India, turning out to be resigned to Partition
2016-12-10 15:08:50 · answer #5 · answered by donenfeld 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read Noam Chomsky's Fateful Triangle for some light on your question
2006-08-01 21:00:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if your father was murdered and mother and sister were taken to no where and you were forced to leave your land..you would have understood.....Arab people are now united more than ever..the scattered are the Arab leaders and those are day-dreamers with nothing to do with what's going on in the streets.
2006-07-24 21:23:46 · answer #7 · answered by rubi 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋