Conservative estimates are, that George W. Bush has killed over 100,000 innocent people, in Iraq, alone!!! Manson doesn't come close!!!
Doc
2006-07-24 19:31:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Arbuckle Doc 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well, considering the fact that a wartime president cannot be held accountable for deaths caused by war, the answer would be Charles Manson.
WAR causes death. If you were to go along that line, then FDR was worse than Manson, so were LBJ, JFK, and Teddy Roosevelt, and Eisenhower, and George Washington (all those poor British he helped kill!), and what about Abraham Lincoln? and well, just about every other president we've had during war.
2006-07-25 07:53:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
George W. Bush
2006-07-25 02:27:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by jetfire 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rhetorical question right? Well I'll answer it anyway. Who knows? Maybe I'll get the 10 points. Bush killed 10's of thousands of people. Manson never got to the triple digits in deaths.
2006-07-25 02:30:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by big_dog832001 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think either actually killed anyone, Manson brainwashed some hopeless kids into killing several people and Bush ordered the destruction of many more lives in the middle east.
2006-07-25 02:30:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think its pretty ironic that Bush has killed more Iraqis in 3 years than Saddam ever did in 30. Hopefully we'll see some real justice, he should be tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Hell, he should be tried for a whole list of stuff. Just because he's the president does not mean he is above the law.
2006-07-25 02:29:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by SpectacularVernacular 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Georgie has Manson beat hands down, but bush was not born with a platinum spoon in the mouth, he was born with it up his ****.
2006-07-25 02:31:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Seikilos 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush has caused the deaths of more people than Manson ever dreamed of.
2006-07-25 02:30:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush of course.
2006-07-25 02:27:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by MedStudent 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush. Bush Bush
2006-07-25 02:33:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Amy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have no discernment. Is Pres. Bush running around with a gun? Do you think terrorists should run the whole show? Where do YOU draw the line of what is appropriate for defenders against terrorists? Where do you stand? Or do you just lie in the heap of 9-11?
2006-07-25 02:30:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by Cordelia 4
·
0⤊
1⤋