She told Rusty(husband) that she wasn't right...and that she want'd to kill herself. She has a chemically imbalanced brain and it got worse with every pregnancy...at the 6th child she lost it. If u were rusty would you leave your kids with an admitted insane person? Keep having kids and leave them to be home schooled with this person knowing how unstable they are? Come on!! doctors had her on 3 meds cause she was very ill. She should have been removed from her home and kids after the 2nd kid when she first felt suicidal. what do u think?
Here in Houston a lot of new facts comming out.
1) we all know she did it 2) If your not able to keep your head clear of voices telling u to kill how are u supposed to make rational decisions 3)and 2 the person who asked how dare blame Rusty...he was obviously the only sane adult in the house! He took her 2 the Dr's off where he was told to keep her contact supervised- family, babysitter, nanny, he's an engineer at NASA! He's got the money.
2006-07-24 18:27:25 · 6 answers · asked by D C 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
She is a menace to society and needs to be put away in a hospital for the criminally insane forever and ever. Any Mother who could methodically drown her own children needs to be put away where she can do no further harm to anyone. It really doesn't matter if she was in her right mind at the time or not.
2006-07-24 18:34:00 · answer #1 · answered by eggman 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you reposting this to get everybody to say she is not guilty? Just because everybody has opinions to this makes neither sides right or wrong. It doesn't matter what we think or what you think.. the fact of the matter is that 5 innocent lives are gone. Honey, I had SEVERE post partum depression to where I put my daughter in foster care instead of harming her. THAT IS RESPONSIBLE. It doesn't matter what her husband could or couldn't have done. That is called hindsight. You are not going to be able to change anybody's mind. It is something called freewill and that is something that Andrea Yates took the liberty of using the day she murdered all five of her children.
2006-07-25 01:38:11 · answer #2 · answered by curiositykillsthecat 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She's guilty.. and a good reason for women to have freedom of choice. Why do THAT to your children when you could have aborted? She's nuts.. and religious beliefs constrained her. She needs to be found guilty again, even if she is NUTS!
2006-07-25 02:17:47 · answer #3 · answered by dollface 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO ONE HERE HAS FACTS ON JUST HOW FAR GOME YATES WAS. WE HAVE NO REAL ANSWERS, JUST THAT OBVIOUSLY SHE WAS UNDER DR'S CARE SO SHE WAS NOT WELLL, HOW WELL? DON'T KNOW
2006-07-25 02:19:21 · answer #4 · answered by INDIA 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the bible it says thou shall not kill so she is guilty
2006-07-25 01:43:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Naw, she's guilty.
2006-07-25 01:32:46 · answer #6 · answered by Jake 'N' Shakes 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋