Is it true that the "big bang theory" agrees with religion?

Question

I was told that the "big bang" was when God's parents conceived him. True or False?

Answer 1

Hello? Surely you can't be serious.

Answer 2

Depends on how you interprete the religion. We are not 100% sure of how the Earth is formed and exactly when the Sun is form, and religion does not say that the world is not created from a big bang. It might be possible, first come Sun, then the Earth, then somehow the Earth is formed, then due to evolution comes the animals and birds and fishes (who knows which comes first?), then the humans. God could have create the universe by a Big Bang.

I believe that Science and Religion is related. All the religion I believe can be explained by science although maybe not now.

Answer 3

Not true. the bible doesn't teach that, Jewish history doesn't teach that and I have BIG problems with the Big Bang. According to science, there was a massive Hydrogen cloud floating in nothingness that exploded, causing the resultant gasses to swirl and form into planets, suns, etc.

1. Where did the Hydrogen come from?

2 Hydrogen won't burn or explode without the presence of an oxidizer (oxygen). If there was no Oxygen, how did the Hydrogen explode?

3. hydrogen and Oxygen can coexist withoug blowing up, unless something starts the combustion process.....Who lit the match?

4. Even if the Hydrogen did have oxygen in it, and it did explode, the only results left would be water vapor. Where did all the dirt that forms the planets come from?

Answer 4

Is this a setup for a bad pun? Religion does not explain God's origin. Maybe you have a point. On a more serious note, Big Bang certainly does not agree with Christianity. Genesis begins with two somewhat different creation myths that are primitive and naive. Modern science disproves such childish tales. Sadly some people refuse to grow up and relinquish belief in fairy tales.

Answer 5

There are some who claim to be religious who have incorporated the big bang theory into religion, but if you read Genesis, you will see that God did not create in one single act. There is no way the big bang theory can agree with true religion.

Answer 6

you're concerning "enable there be mild", the word in connection with introduction. the vast bang does not handle the situation of beginning or introduction. the vast bang is the flexibility of develop and remains visibly in progression. (many cases people who confer with the vast bang are conversing of the very early element.) The info got here across so a techniques does not point out the beginning of the factors for the vast bang, nor does the info let us know something of activities going on in the previous the vast bang. extremely than many times reciting this qualifying sentence, the vast bang is oftentimes in basic terms observed (incorrectly) with the aid of fact the beginning up or "introduction" of the universe. television documentaries do no longer worry to make the excellence. although no longer technically nicely suited and because no in the previous information is attainable, for many functional discussions of the physics of the universe, this is okay. For discussions on the beginning of the universe, the blunders is unacceptable. .

Answer 7

Well, that's definitely an interesting story, but not one found in any religious text.

The nature of the Big Bang has sent physicist and astronomers searching for what happened beforehand. And apparently the search is turning more and more to a creator, something that transcends the known universe.

The link below contains a lot of information on the subject, or search for author Dr. Hugh Ross for books that relate science to the Bible. Great reading for scientists!

Answer 8

Everything agrees or disagrees with religion. It is in the interpretation. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Well this holds true for religions and their belief systems. A person who needs to believe in "something" will utilize written words, sights, sounds, etc., to explain their environment to give them comfort.

But a big bang?! Surely you jest! No man can take credit for a "big bang!" May be a little, itty bitty one; short on the big part but generous on their interpretation of bang!

Answer 9

sorry but this david t who posted above me is a moron with his hydogen theory on the big bang. Hes just a shining example of the christain wackos who use misinformation to justify the beleif in a 3000 year old imaginary carpenter. Matter and anti matter is all that is beleived to have existed prior to the big bang no space no time, not a big floating gas cloud. sorry for the reply

Answer 10

Nothing agrees with Religion, just look at the sourpuss answers the religious give to all questions

Edit: David T please go back and re read the text book, What you said has nothing to do with the big bang or with science, and I can not imagine where you got such a weird idea from.

Answer 11

While this is somewhat off the real question, I believe it answers some very sensitive issues:

Religion States that God made man in His own image
Science states we are all just a bunch of complex copies of the first single cell that was created on earth.
Therefore, God was a single cell and we are much more advanced then He was.