If she can't pass a drug test the father will get the kids unless he is an even bigger loser than she it.
Thank heavens the father is stepping up to the plate. The woman doesn't deserve the kids and they do not deserve to be inflicted with her.
Open and shut case, Daddy gets the kids.
2006-07-24 16:42:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by lcmcpa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Truth of the matter is.. the courts would always prefer to return the kids to the real parents. Participation in rehabs and counseling will set the bar for who gets what. Sometimes it comes down to who can actually take care of the kids and sometimes it comes down to who's got the cash to get an attorney.
Most Judges will not award custody back to someone who cannot show progress in recovery. continuing dirties on tests are an example of this. The husband could be a total **** but if he is doing what the court wants.. he'll get the kids.
2006-07-24 16:41:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by tattooz2 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who is the abusive parent, the mother or the father? It sounds like it's the mother. Is the father clean? If yes, then his chances of getting the kids should be pretty good.
If the mother doesn't bother to show up for visitation, why is she even in the picture?
2006-07-24 16:39:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hopefully she has NO chance. Realistically, she probably doesn't have a chance. Hopefully the father gets them. As long as his house is the best place for the kids, that's where they'll most likely get put.
2006-07-24 16:36:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by heidielizabeth69 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like he probably will if he is stable esp. if this has been going on for a while and he has been involved during that time. If he only has just been contacted, then he will be monitored as well. He has a right to his children . Most states prefer to release to family. Michigan courts love dads who "step up" even after 2yrs.
2006-07-26 14:29:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
this isn't worry-free. i desire to assert i could shop the canines, with the aid of fact i glance my sister's pit and that i be responsive to ways friendly he's in the direction of people. It ought to be an remoted incident. the babies have been upsetting him. My sister's canines did chew her baby on the brow, left a small mark. It exchange right into a warning after her 3 year poked him in the attention for umpteenth time. That exchange into extremely a whilst in the past and the boy respects the canines area and the canines gets alongside with him in basic terms effective now. despite if, you're no longer speaking a pair of small warning nip. This canines tried to take a chew out of the newborn's leg. there is not any longer something a infant can do to a a hundred lb pit bull that ought to warrant a "warning" to that severe. i does no longer ruin the canines. i could locate him a house with out babies and be sure they knew the canines historic past and have been experienced with stable breeds. The canines desires suitable guidance in self administration. He does not appreciate people with the aid of fact the Leaders, and he needs to if he's going to be risk-free to be around. no longer anybody that could own a canines, ought to own a pit. they want consistent guidance. i do no longer think he's a write off, he in basic terms desires somebody on top of issues in any respect cases.
2016-10-08 07:09:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by haslinger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The father will get custody! The mother-absolutely no way in h**l!!
2006-07-24 16:37:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by dulcern4u 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Slim and None and Slim is out of town.
2006-07-24 16:35:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cookie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no chance in hell. if the judge has any brains
2006-07-24 16:36:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by LARCO 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Zero !
2006-07-24 16:35:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋