Okay, basically everything is owned by the Government and every food and material based industry is governement controlled. Entertainment is controlled by the people. The Gov. gives out food and clothes for work done depending on family size and need. Family size and need would have to be checked regulary, but hey.
2006-07-24 15:56:54 · 9 answers · asked by gilligan346 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
No, its not communism. There is a big difference between that and communism. Check wikipedia or somthing if you don't know about communism.
2006-07-24 16:00:57 · update #1
Its called socialism - and the problem with it is that people have no
incentive to work. In capitalism, the more you work, the more money
you get (ok, theoretically). What is the incentive in your system?
Now, you're going to see a lot of statements about what you describe
is communism - and since communism is socialism with a particular
political structure, they are sort of right - but the political structure is
mostly what was wrong with communism.
Everybody remembers Stalin. How many people remember the
fact that basically everybody ate? They stood in line for toilet
paper, but they ate.
However, the fundamental problem of lack of incentive also needs
to be solved.
2006-07-24 16:03:29 · answer #1 · answered by Elana 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I think that a government like that would be easily corrupted because of their immense power, and this could result in a total lack of freedom for the people.
Its kind of like communism, it works in theory, but it wouldn't work so good in the real world
2006-07-24 23:04:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your government is based upon the notion that every person will work to better the state. We have loads who won't even work to better themselves. Those who wish to achieve much are also stymied by the limitation imposed by the state. Financial rewards stimulate research and business ventures.
2006-07-24 23:02:35 · answer #3 · answered by Dino4747 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like communism. Remeber the collapse of the Soviet Union?
2006-07-24 22:59:46 · answer #4 · answered by TruthIsRelative 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah, this is liberalism in the form of communism. No thank you...keep your little Utopia you have created in your mind only. I prefer to think for myself and to decide for myself. If there is nothing to work for, then motivation is lost and people tend to believe they have no reason to live.
2006-07-24 23:01:50 · answer #5 · answered by Mommymonster 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's called communism
2006-07-24 22:59:59 · answer #6 · answered by Arthur Q 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhhhh... EVERYTHING you described are parts of a communist system and utilized by those systems exclusively, regardless of wikipedia states.
2006-07-24 23:08:35 · answer #7 · answered by Joey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're governemnt sucks. Don't run for president. Ever!
2006-07-24 22:59:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its basically commie, and where would the gov get $ for the food?
2006-07-24 23:00:11 · answer #9 · answered by stevo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋