English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so, Can we call American is No.1 Terrorist country ? Why Americans have lot interest in poor countries while in their country they suffer with Child- sex- Rackets, Why they can't stop this simple issue and why do care big issue which completely not their matter ??

2006-07-24 14:54:57 · 25 answers · asked by BOYCUTE 2 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

yep, that is us, sorry right now I have to go kill a cow and eat it. YUMMY

2006-07-24 14:59:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your obviously not an American, and you need better History lessons!! America is looked upon to get other countries out of the messes they are in, at the expense of other americans..and the "rackets" you spoke of is not a "simple" issue!! This "issue" happens in many other countries as well!! I usually TRY not to come out and call people names but your an IDIOT.

2006-07-24 15:04:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is for sure that after second World War up-till now the United States have killed more human than any other countries either by war or through the dictators appointed by them.3 million in Vietnam about 1.5 to 2 million in north Korea about 2 million in Laos and Cambodia about a million in Latin American countries half million in Indonesia when they brought Suharto to power. I do not know how many were beheaded by the sheiks in Arab countries.

2006-07-24 15:18:58 · answer #3 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0 0

Our difficulties are exposed in the media.
And we got a long ways to go before we catch up with the likes of Russia and China when it comes to slaughter. Or Iran and Iraq for that matter.
Child sex rackets?.....hmmm...plenty of people IN THE JOINT for that and it is no secret when they are caught. And these are not rackets. These are individuals commiting crimes.
When terrorists kill 2000+ Americans at the WTC on 911,
And their mentors and spiritual advisors vow to kill many more.
We are gonna go out and get them.
I was against invasion of Iraq but not the Invasion of Afghanistan.
Hunting down of Al Queda quite justified.

2006-07-24 15:17:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The first permanent settlers in New England began arriving in Sixteen-Twenty. They wanted to live in peace with the Indians. They needed to trade with them for food. The settlers also knew that a battle would result in their own, quick defeat because they were so few in number.

Yet, problems began almost immediately. Perhaps the most serious was the different way the American Indians and the Europeans thought about land. This difference created problems that would not be solved during the next several hundred years.
Land was extremely important to the European settlers. In England, and most other countries, land meant wealth. Owning large amounts of land meant a person had great wealth and political power.

Many of the settlers in this new country could never have owned land in Europe. They were too poor. And they belonged to minority religious groups. When they arrived in the new country, they discovered no one seemed to own the huge amounts of land.

Companies in England needed to find people willing to settle in the new country. So they offered land to anyone who would take the chance of crossing the Atlantic Ocean. For many, it was a dream come true. It was a way to improve their lives. The land gave them a chance to become wealthy and powerful
Religion was another problem between the settlers and the Indians. The settlers in New England were very serious about their Christian religion. They thought it was the one true faith and all people should believe in it. They soon learned that the Indians were not interested in learning about it or changing their beliefs.

Many settlers came to believe that Native Americans could not be trusted because they were not Christians. The settler groups began to fear the Indians. They thought of the Indians as a people who were evil because they had no religion. The settlers told the Indians they must change and become Christians. The Indians did not understand why they should change anything.
The European settlers failed to understand that the Native American Indians were extremely religious people with a strong belief in unseen powers. The Indians lived very close to nature. They believed that all things in the universe depend on each other. All native tribes had ceremonies that honored a creator of nature. American Indians recognized the work of the creator of the world in their everyday life. Other events also led to serious problems between the Native Americans and the settlers. One serious problem was disease. The settlers brought sickness with them from Europe. For example, the disease smallpox was well known in Europe. Some people carried the bacteria that caused smallpox, although they did not suffer the sickness itself.

Smallpox was unknown to Native Americans. Today Native lands have become checker boarded with Euro-American ownership and continue to be subject to Congressional Acts to defraud Native people of even more land and the natural resources.

United States history attest to the genocide of North American Indians and most educated Euro Americans and Europeans would agree that a genocide has been committed on this continent in the name of God and riches.
The "Gods" must be crazy to think that their programs of racism and genocide will stop freedom fighters around the world from carrying on with their struggles for liberation and self defense.

2006-07-24 15:24:21 · answer #5 · answered by adapoda 3 · 0 0

You are obviously not a student of history, or perhaps in your country they don't teach about the fine upstanding citizens of the world such as Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, and other experts at extermination. And where did this child-sex rackets thing come from? Have you been reading the National Enquirer again?

2006-07-24 15:01:24 · answer #6 · answered by wild1handy 3 · 0 0

I think it depends on the time of history we are talking about. For example, when the spanish people came to Central America (where I live) they killed who knows how many people... its really relative.
However, I think that the answer to your other questions is just this:

MONEY

Most of american people only care about making money without caring who is going to suffer when they get that money. That{s why they cannot pay attention to their own family, to their children and keep butting into another countrys bussinesses and have so many problems with their killer-teenagers and sex-addicts and freaking stuff like that.

2006-07-24 15:01:16 · answer #7 · answered by amagomo 1 · 0 0

The US is not a terrorist -

FBI definitions of Terrorism:

There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined
in the Code of Federal Regulations as “...the unlawful use of force and violence against
persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or
any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” (28 C.F.R.
Section 0.85)
i
FBI POLICY
AND
GUIDELINES
nnn accordance with U.S. counterterrorism
nnpolicy, the FBI considers terrorists to be criminals.
FBI efforts in countering terrorist threats are
multifaceted. Information obtained through FBI
investigations is analyzed and used to prevent
terrorist activity and, whenever possible, to effect the
arrest and prosecution of potential perpetrators.
FBI investigations are initiated in accordance with the
following guidelines:
I
The FBI further describes terrorism as either domestic or international, depending
on the origin, base, and objectives of the terrorists. For purposes of this report, the
FBI will use the following definitions:
Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by
a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or its
territories without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate
or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in
furtherance of political or social objectives.
International terrorism involves violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that
are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any state, or that would
be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or
any state. These acts appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population,
influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or affect
the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping. International terrorist
acts occur outside the United States or transcend national boundaries in terms of
the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to
coerce or intimidate, or the locale in which the perpetrators operate or seek asylum.

2006-07-24 14:56:31 · answer #8 · answered by   6 · 0 0

America has always wanted to help other countries even when maybe our ideals might not work for them. As for killing people, look at Lebanon, Syria, Iraq,Iran,Israel,Afghanistan & the rest of the Middle Eastern countries. They have been fighting & killing each other for thousands of years. Look at all the Muslim fractions just like the United States. Each fraction thinking they are right and are killing inicent people every day. The Shites & Sunni's. So before you make such absurd comments maybe you should get your facts straight first.

2006-07-24 15:06:14 · answer #9 · answered by Tanker 4 · 0 0

what are you talking about?

The USA openly reports the truth, good or bad. Look to countries like China, Iran and North Korea where the truth is hidden from the people.

How many people died in India this year due to poverty and poor health condiitons? India must be a terrorist country then, right?

If you don't do more to help the poor in India then you, my friend, are a terrorist for letting them die. (according to your arguement)

2006-07-24 14:56:03 · answer #10 · answered by Plasmapuppy 7 · 0 0

The US is running out of natural resources. Water oil lumber etc. They have a set of burned out cities due to massive poverty and disparity of the classes. They need natural resources and are looking to poor countries to buy or run or or or.

All they have right now is a bankrupt nation a trillion dollar debt the government can't pay off and massive military and they know they need to use it to conquer and dictate resource if they are going to keep consumeing at the rate they are .

Get it?

2006-07-24 15:01:22 · answer #11 · answered by Trout 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers