Hi,
I am a Chessplayer with Elo over 2400. I think it depends what Level you have to answer this question.
Fritz 9 is for sure stronger as Chessmaster, but there are a handfull of programs who are better as Fritz. The User Interface of Fritz/Shredder/Junior (they use all the same Interface) is very elegant.
But if you want to LEARN Chess then i think is Chessmaster better. The Level of Chessmaster is still strong enough to kick your a**, hehe. The Learning section of Chessmaster is much better as the Trainingspart of Fritz.
World Championchip 2006:
1) Junior 9,0
2) Shredder 8,5
2) Rajlich
4) Zappa 7,5
Fritz 9 did not compete. But I think that Fritz would not have won this tournament. I guess that Fritz 9 would have been around Place 4-5.
Chessmaster would very likely not had a chance under the Top 10 programs ... if all Top programs would ply.
Here is the World Rankinglist for Chessprograms:
http://web.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/list.htm
2006-07-25 10:46:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by torosorogoro 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Chessmaster is a relatively weak engine compared to the Fritz family (Shredder, Junior, Hiarcs etc)...
However, Chessmaster is a great program for learning...it has a couple of hundred personalities which play at all levels, so you can have it play a very weak game or a very strong game.
(When I say it's a relatively weak engine, I'm comparing it to other engines, not to people...it can still kick the butts of over 90% of the people in the world who play chess, when set to its highest level of strength)
Chessmaster also has some excellent tutorials on different subjects.
Chessmaster was really designed by "gamers" as opposed to real chess programmers (which is where Fritz, etc comes from).
Chessmaster also has a nice analysis feature...it actually narrates it's analysis when you play it back... it doesn't analyze variations the way Fritz, Shredder etc can, but it is certainly adequate for a lot of people's needs.
I've heard that Yasser Seirawan himself supplied the voice of the Chessmaster.
Also, Josh Waitzkin (of "Searching for Bobby Fischer" fame) has HIS own tutorial section, in which he annotates many of his own games. That's a great feature.
2006-07-25 14:08:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hi; in case you get a draw against a working laptop or notebook then it extremely is considering the fact which you probably did no longer win ... and the notebook could no longer win the two basically like over the board. different posters have given you the technical information of how the draw works. right it extremely is the no longer so nicely widespread reality approximately attracts and chess -- In expert chess the place there is funds on the line and masters enjoying -- some 0.33 of the video games are gained by capacity of white some 0.33 are gained by capacity of black and a few 0.33 are drawn. in case you look at tournament play there are frequently situations whilst there are extra attracts than wins. one way of observing a drawn sport is to understand which you probably did no longer lose -- the different participant might desire to no longer enforce checkmate against you. it extremely is no longer proper how many products are on the board or who does what -- He did no longer win! for sure you probably did no longer win the two ... yet that would desire to be the way existence works. individually i stumble on that a number of my suitable video games resulted in attracts ... i became enjoying a extra useful participant and he did no longer make any blunders -- neither did I ... my defence stopped one and all of his assaults and he became able to circumvent my traps and so whilst we exhausted the suitable strikes we could play the sport ended with neither participant securing a win. i stumble on many activities to be unfair because of the fact the draw isn't considered -- a soccer sport is meant to final 4 quarters of quarter-hour it extremely is the guideline -- yet whilst the top of the sport comes and the score is equivalent then -- Oh we would desire to continually replace the regulations -- upload extra time -- why no longer face the very incontrovertible fact that the two communities performed the two nicely? In baseball 2 thoroughly equivalent communities in thought can play the sport perpetually (and persons say chess is a sluggish sport). Gens Una Sumus invoice
2016-12-14 13:12:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The ChessMaster series has been around for many years, going back to the days of Win 3.1. Most people would say that ChessMaster is the best.
If you wish to play an interesting online version of chess, check out this URL: http://turbulence.org/spotlight/thinking/
Note: requires JAVA
Good Luck!
EC
2006-07-24 14:02:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by EC 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can second Fritz. It's has a very strong engine, good analysis tools, and good features to keep over the board playing/ learning interesting (AI personality types, different playing modes, etc.)
It also integrates with chessbase cd-roms.
2006-07-25 00:52:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by OMG, I ♥ PONIES!!1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bringer. A free chess program by Gerrit Reubold.
http://chess.kearman.com/html/software.htm
2006-07-25 03:22:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by cordefr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
fritz 8
2006-07-25 01:33:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by soham s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
fritz 9
2006-07-24 14:01:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by el.tuco 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
chess master series no dout bout it
2006-07-24 20:11:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stubs 2
·
0⤊
0⤋