Hillary Clinton oh god no!!!!!!!
she is a liberal crack pot.
she would have no control over spending.
she would be giving money away like crazy.
you think we are spending money now. she will fund every crazk pot idea in the world.
And every city would be attacked by terriorists.
not to mention she flip flops on every issue.
but actually Elizabeth Dole would be a great president.
Elizabeth Hanford Dole has had a long career in public service. She has served in significant positions for five presidents, including being the first woman to hold the position of Secretary of Transportation. In 1991 Dole was appointed President of the American Red Cross, the world's foremost humanitarian organization.
Dole graduated with distinction from Duke University in 1958. She earned a degree from Harvard Law School in 1965 and also holds a master's degree in education and government from Harvard. In 1971, Dole was appointed Deputy Assistant to President Nixon for Consumer Affairs, for which she received the National Safety Council's Distinguished Service Award in 1989. From 1973 to 1979, she was a member of the Federal Trade Commission.
As President of the American Red Cross from 1991-1999, Dole helped launch a sweeping transformation of the Red Cross Biomedical Services to incorporate medical technology to improve how the agency collects, tests and distributes more than one-half of the nation's blood supply. She led a dramatically successful effort that raised more than $562 million to assist victims of weather and non-weather related disasters. Under her leadership, the American Red Cross was consistently recognized for outstanding financial stewardship.
Dole, who has been named by the Gallup Poll as one of the world's most admired women, has received numerous awards for her public service and leadership, including the Women Executives in State Government Lifetime Achievement Award, the League of Women Voters Leadership Award and the Raoul Wallenberg Award for Humanitarian Service. She also was inducted in to the National Women's Hall of Fame in 1995.
There is NO woman who would be better at being president. Period!
2006-07-24 13:12:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Most of the women I'd vote for are fictional characters. Number 1 on the list is Brenda Lynn Jones, Empress, Solar System Empire. The young goddess protector of the Life of Earth, ruler of all space within 1000 astronomical units of the sun and more than 53,000 kilometers from the center of Earth, renowned for her wisdom and justice, would probably be the best President the United States ever had. Alas, she's fictional. Alas again, even if she weren't fictional, she'd refuse to take the job.
2016-09-08 00:01:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dump the liberals into Jupiter 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if you're asking what woman I'd like to see run for president, I'd say, Carol Moseley Braun. She was actually my favorite out of all the candidates that were involved in the 2004(?) debates. Obviously, my memory sucks since I can't even be sure of what friggin' year it was, so I can't tell you why I liked her at the time. I just remember thinking she made the most sense out of everyone and said what she said in direct human laguage and not political speak. I believe you can listen to an interview with her here: http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/democrats2004/braun.html
...that is, if the link isn't dead.
2006-07-24 13:18:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joe CRUD 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton
2006-07-24 13:07:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by pycosal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton
2006-07-24 13:05:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by J 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What concerns is the first to run who had any genuine danger...that could be Hillary. All others contained in the previous were under no circumstances taken heavily by any popular. What receives me is the emphasis on "lady". quite some different international places international huge have had leaders who were women human beings. Take observe of the syntax there...leaders who were women human beings. The governing dynamic is administration, no longer sex.
2016-10-15 04:12:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because women are better! i'm just kidding. but i think a woman would have a different perspective of things that need to be done than a man would. also, i think it's about time a woman ran for president.
2006-07-24 13:07:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Claire ☺ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Condi Rice
Jean Kirkpatrick
2006-07-24 13:06:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Condolezza Rice
2006-07-24 13:07:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Elizabeth Dole
2006-07-24 13:07:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by chuck3011 3
·
0⤊
0⤋