Pakistan along with the USA, Rusia, China, France, United Kingdom, India and Israel are countries currently recognized to have nuclear weapons.
2006-07-24 13:07:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by criticinme 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well they are manufacturing nuclear weapons and while using would be foolish, it does make them something to be feared. Then again, a pakistani might be saying: "The US shouldnt be allowed to have nuclear weapons! A corrupt country that attacked our far FAR neighbor Iraq just because the commanders of their economies wanted more oil shows how irresponsible they are!"
So hey, it works both way. Better if none of use had nuclear bombs but the whole world will just keep manufacturing those big genociders cause man, if Einstein couldnt even convince the world to stop using/making these bombs (which he did try but failed since we obviously still have MANY bombs)
well anyway, if the world's smartest man couldnt do it then you probably cant either. Untill a nuclear fallout happens and millions are genocided but lets ingore that for now like everyone eles with power is :D
2006-07-24 13:06:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jake 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no one actually must have any sort of issues whatsoever with pakistan manufacturing nuclear bombs.. it is none of the concern of any nation since pakistan is an independent nation and thus should in no way be pressurized by ANY one.
it is the right of any nation to defend itself in a way it deems better but at the same time that does not cause any sort of damage whatsoever to others.. and pakistan having nukes is not causing any damage to any one mind that!
what about israel!? why arent we discussing that!? they have used chemical weapons in gaza and lebanon.. or havent you seen the press photos of the horrible and never-seen-before injuries and wounds!? what about israel launching the offensive against lebanon and palestine terming it as a means to defend its boundaries?! what about that!?
2006-07-28 08:15:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Shariq M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO , bombing pakistan by using USAF might want to be the most important mistake. there are numerous causes for this. presently, u.s. is in a state of monetary decline, by using already combating 2 wars in afghanistan and iraq. it presently can not visit a special war even as the spouse and toddlers challenge is so undesirable decrease back at homestead. also, there is not any genuine information that pakistan's nuclear guns will be used for terrorist applications. also , u.s. calls for the help of pakistan's authorities to regulate the challenge in afghanistan. so , on the on the spot , US desires pakistan to win war in afghanistan. even as US no longer desires pakistan's help, they can concentration their interest on pakistan's events. Pakistan's nuclear coverage has also performed no longer some thing to illustrate their purpose to apply nuclear guns as a significant deterrent.
2016-11-25 22:11:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
definitely should not. (1)the government itself does not have control over certain factions in the country. (2)they are suspected of leaking out this technology to rogue nations and (3)most importantly have openly stated that if they are in a position of losing a war, they will strike the enemy with nuclear weapons, unliek its counterpart india which has stated that they will not use nuclear weapons as a first strike option (.. which is pretty stupid because india is too big for pakistan to destroy with a first strike, and it will definitely retaliate in kind)
2006-07-24 13:10:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nobody should manufacture nuclear bombs
2006-07-24 13:12:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by denizbt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well they have right to own nuclear energy
2006-07-24 13:03:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ivan1989 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They already have them, too late.
2006-07-24 13:03:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paki has nukes already. Sorry.
2006-07-24 13:04:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by jack f 7
·
0⤊
0⤋