It's their property so I would assume so. It is probably to ensure privacy of pay rates. They don't want anyone having the opportunity to find out what anyone else makes.
2006-07-24 12:28:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It sounds more legal than illegal. I know of people that work in department stores, you've seen them... they must use a clear see through hand bag. So its harder to get away with stealing things.
So on those lines, I guess it would be within an employers rights to make rules that maintain some decorum among all employees.
2006-07-24 12:33:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by ••Mott•• 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It might be fun to challenge them about the physical act of OPENING the check, versus walking off-site, opening the check, and returning on-site with an OPENED check.
2006-07-24 14:20:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jetgirly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
<> basically because of the fact something it criminal does no longer propose it extremely is best. <> there's a reason you will no longer be able to spell 'anticipate' without '***'. people who anticipate too lots finally end up making asses of themselves. <> does not make sense, does it - and yet, there you're advocating human beings in basic terms anticipate the government is sweet! <> incorrect! <> advert hominem assaults injury your credibility. in keeping with hazard Marc, like me, does not see too lots interior the way of credibility whilst analyzing your question. <> The term "fetus" actually capacity "the extra youthful interior the womb". The fetus IS a residing individual. existence starts at concept, no longer delivery nor some arbitrary component in between. for this reason, each abortion constitutes the homicide of an unborn individual. <> however the fetus IS human. for this reason, abortion IS homicide. <> what's so narrow minded approximately acknowledging the unborn for the residing people they are? considering the fact which you're actually not able to try this, does not that propose your ideas is definitely extra narrow than mine? <> That basically is going to coach how schizophrenic human establishments could be - and you desire to anticipate such an corporation (the government) is sweet.
2016-12-14 13:05:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope its n ot legal at all
2006-07-24 12:27:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kittie_Nash 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
not unless its in the businesses regulation.
2006-07-24 13:05:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by pinkpicklebox 4
·
0⤊
0⤋