English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is that not clear over the years ? This two countries act quite similarly and act like two big stubbern child ?

2006-07-24 12:06:38 · 24 answers · asked by dotab 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

24 answers

Leogirl, why are you such a stupid ****?

And to answer the question: You know what happens with bullies? They beat up smaller weaker kids and they become bolder and bolder. Eventually they mess with the wrong person. And guess what happens then? The bully gets beaten up and put in its place.

And Thomas R. the organization called Hezbollah was created in around 1985 to "resist" Israeli occupation from 1982 to 2000. Terrorists are not created in a vaccuum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah

If there is unrest, the Israeli's started it. Many years ago.. like 24 years ago. Just because it is in the past doesn't mean the facts have changed and the responsibilities are on somebody else's shoulders.

Has anyone ever asked Hezbollah why they do what they do? Ever seen the movie "Indecent Proposal"? Robert Redford tells tells Demi Moore "everything is for sale". Unfortunately the "business minded" administration can't negotiate. Everybody can be negotiated with. Every single person. Even republicans can be negotiated with!! So why has no one ever tried to talk to these people? A similar situation exists in South East Asia between India and Pakistan. It is still not solved, and there are still terrorist attacks, but have they stopped negotiating? They have come a long way from where they were.

2006-07-24 12:16:04 · answer #1 · answered by The_Dark_Knight 4 · 1 1

It is amazing the name calling and negative comments made by the answers to this question. Everything from 4 letter words to telling someone that they have no right to even put an answer up for the question. Someone as usual even critizises the question. All of this and you people don't even know one another. Now throw 3 or 4 hundred years of living as neighbours or even longer as enemies and the Israeli's and the Lebanese have let the situation get much worse. Name calling means nothing, rock throwing is passe and now greater horrific methods of getting back at the other person has developed. Historically they hate one another and like the Democrats and the Republicans in the USA one is not going to let the other get ahead. To me they are both terrorists. We live on a planet called earth and there are far more important things to deal with than what these two are fighting over. The world is a fantastic place and yet these two are missing the show and making the rest of us pay the price for their inabilities to get along with one another. They don't even have the inclination to pack up and leave for a new address so that they don't have to keep fighting because that would be considered a weakness and the other side would win. So if you wonder what these two differing opinionated groups are all about, just stand back and look at what some people have as answers on this question. When you point a finger at someone else, three fingers point back to yourself! C'mon people this is what a democracy is supposed to be all about, free speech. ( please forgive spelling errors, Oops, the spellcheck is having problems sign is on )

2006-07-24 12:34:35 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. PDQ 4 · 0 0

When disgussing the war(s) in the Middle East, and using 9/11 as a justification for going to war, I can understand that, but what I don't understand is that the terrorists responsible for 9/11 are located in Afghanistan, and yet Bush bombs everywhere BUT Afghanistan...

And some say that Bush went to war because of the disbutes between the countries over there, and that's understandable... If it was a kindergarden! Why did he have to meddle?!

2006-07-24 12:41:14 · answer #3 · answered by godnattilalle 2 · 1 0

Your brain has blown a gasket! Mr. Dark Knight the smaller weaker ones you are talking about Being Palestine Hezbollah and the other terrorist sponsoring countries/terror organizations? They are weaker because all they know is death, war, beheading etc etc. They have not joined the rest of the world in education, technology, medicine and peace. Hezbollah started the conflict with Israel with their kidnapping. I hope they are enjoying what they are getting because they really do deserve it. The only problem is the innocent Lebanese people, if we could evacuate them and exterminate the vermin left over, the world would be a much better place.

2006-07-24 12:16:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's really simple. If Muslims don't attack Israel or America, then Israel and America will not attack them.

People who defend terrorists always seem to overlook two things. One, the people they are defending are - by definition, not opinion - terrorists. They terrorize people. Two, the terrorists always start the violence. If Hezbollah hadn't started the war, then there wouldn't be a war.

As soon as Muslims learn how to live in peace, then there will be peace throughout most of the world.

2006-07-24 12:12:06 · answer #5 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0 0

WRONG!!!
When Israel bombs it`s NEIGHBOURS IT is defending itself.
When America bombs another country IT is after that country`s oil.
When the terrorists such as Hammas and Hezbollah cease to hide among "innocents" THEN and ONLY then can democratic countries (Israel is the ONLY freely elected democracy in the Middle East) like Israel can go about their business of surviving whilst surrounded by enemies.
COME OUT OF HIDING you murderous scumbags and fight like the Warriors you think yourselves and THEN perhaps the "free World" will be sympathetic to your grievances.Continue to attack Israel and the West in cowardly manner and you deserve to be treated like the detritus you are.
Don`t call it a religious war ,a JIHAD ,call it what it is irresponsible murder of innocents by cowards.

2006-07-24 13:57:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

There is a difference between bombing MILITARY targets and accidentally killing civilians (U.S. and Israel), and intentionally bombing innocent civilians . The first is self-defense, the second is terrorism.

When America or Israel intentionally bombs innocent civilians (and they have), they are acting as terrorists. If insurgents attack military targets, they are not terrorists.

But generally speaking, the U.S. sticks to military targets and does not try to kill civilians. Many of those who have attacked us recently DO try to purposely kill civilians. There is a difference.

2006-07-24 12:15:52 · answer #7 · answered by timm1776 5 · 0 0

OK Let me explain: When the United States and Isreal Respond to a Terriost attack. They don't target civilians on purpose. When Hammas, Hezbollah, ect Attack they DO intentionally Target Civilians. BIG DIFFERENCE!!!!!!!!!!! By the way I haven't heard of ONE single case of an Isreali or American for that matter Driving a car bomb into a crowded market place or strapping a bomb on there back and blowing up a group of civilians in the name of Allah.

2006-07-24 12:43:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

So the US should just sit back and let the morons of the world do what they will to their neighbors?
How many countries have we helped rid of tyranny over the years? You think Europe wanted to be overran and made to learn German? You think Kuwait wanted to be made a territory of Iraq? Someone has to have the balls to stand up to these tyrants and idiots, to the US and all their allies...HURRAH.
You can bet if we come knocking on your door...you did something to get us over there.
And these idiots that participate in terrorism in the name of the Koran.....I've read the Koran, it is strictly against violence...so go find another excuse make you seem legitimate.

2006-07-24 12:28:37 · answer #9 · answered by jimmy h 3 · 0 0

Fantastic question

America and israel (they are the same country) will happily bomb countries with apache helicopters (that can be shot down with an Kalashnikov AK-47 and completely violate the geneva convention and humanitarian laws of warfare)

They are not stubborn chilren, they are stubborn foetuses.

2006-07-24 12:19:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers