English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

An ex social worker, now an actor, tells us here backstage that a tribe was discovered many years ago, who had not made the connection between sexual intercourse and childbirth. He thinks in Borneo.
Can this possibly be true? I'm not putting money down that it's false.

2006-07-24 11:45:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Anthropology

14 answers

sure, seems sensible to me.

2006-07-25 00:03:50 · answer #1 · answered by monkeymanelvis 7 · 2 0

I know of a tribe of pygmy's who lived in the long pampas grass of borneo, I think they were called the wherethefukarewes.

2006-07-24 18:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by dopeysaurus 5 · 0 0

Melanesia, actually. it was the case at the beginning of the last century. Maybe they have figured it out by now or were told, but, see 'Sex and Repression in Savage Society' by Malinowski.

2006-07-24 18:52:31 · answer #3 · answered by wehwalt 3 · 0 0

I could easily believe that it is entirely possible to not make a connection between sex and birth.

2006-07-24 20:19:10 · answer #4 · answered by wollemi_pine_writer 6 · 0 0

that doesnt surprise me, there are people on council estates in the uk who are just as well informed about the ways of the world

2006-07-25 15:43:10 · answer #5 · answered by Dirk Wellington-Catt 3 · 0 0

hey im not sure if its true or not but i know there are a lot of people on my estate that still havnt realised that u have sex u get pregnant

2006-07-24 20:21:21 · answer #6 · answered by buggerlugs 6 · 0 0

Utter rubbish.

2006-07-24 19:00:04 · answer #7 · answered by M14forever 2 · 0 0

I think he was reading too much Jean Auel, but it is possible I suppose.

2006-07-24 18:49:05 · answer #8 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0 0

Sounds like bovine excrement too me. Take the bet.

2006-07-24 19:01:07 · answer #9 · answered by jack f 7 · 0 0

it would have had to have been many many many many
years ago. remember that they would have had to have
been so completely isolated that no one from another
tribe could have communicated the facts to them.

2006-07-24 18:50:22 · answer #10 · answered by agedlioness 5 · 0 0

It's probably true.

2006-07-24 19:17:15 · answer #11 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers