English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-24 10:15:38 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

Fact: No steel frame building has EVER collapsed because of fire or plane crash.... before 911 or after. Yet 3 buildings did on the same day!

Fact: According to "the law of falling bodies" accepted by scientists as mathematical fact , both towers came down at free fall speed... as in a vacuum... as fast as a steel ball dropped in open air ... impossible according to what we know is possible.

2006-07-24 12:59:53 · update #1

Fact: The steel in the towers was UL certified for temps of 2800 degrees F for several hrs (fire-proofing non-withstanding) ..... also a "pancake collapse" would not cause a 1300 ft building to come down in 8-10 seconds.1

2006-07-24 13:59:42 · update #2

22 answers

Yes. Check out a free online movie called "Loose Change II". Also, think about who gained from this caper. And what the excuses are. Think about why the congressional investigation was squelched. Also, google the phrase "Dave Emory-listen-stream" and make sure your sound card is working, and then turn up your ears. And how come we just can't seem to catch up to the big bad OBL.........?

2006-07-24 10:25:34 · answer #1 · answered by peacetrain 3 · 3 1

No

After the United Airlines Flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the towers this started a chain reaction. Now each plane's wreckage is now burning jet fuel and debris in each tower. Originally the twin towers were designed with heat installation over the steel Truss structures and supports. At the time of impact the planes knocked the installation of the all the structures on corresponding floors surrounding the impact area. When the jet fuel in the wreckage generated temperatures over 1000°F (537°C) at this temperature steel becomes increasingly malleable and plastic thus creating a domino affect. All of the weight of the floors above the impact area with the help of gravity the structure's gave way.

The WTC had a pipe design this was one of the contributing factors coupled with the factors stated above contributed to the collapse. Take a look at the footage you will notice the towers collapsed within itself. the outer skin of the building aided the chain reaction.

2006-07-24 13:39:15 · answer #2 · answered by Mr X 2 · 0 0

So whats this pseudo hypothesis that there was a demolition at the same time the airplanes did hit the towers. I believe is really impossible, the impact of the airplanes was enough weight to burn every building.

Cables, gas, water pipes, lines, everything that is inside the structure in some way was affected by the airplanes and that caused more impact on inferior levels. Would you believe someone human could do a demolition with children inside the building?

When you see a demolition , everything burns almost at the same time, look at the demolition of old buildings, they come down and fall down from the bottom to the top. Here there was fire from the top and "slowly" started to burn the bottom, this wasnt a demolition, if there was where were the controls of that demolition and who bought them?

2006-07-24 10:42:32 · answer #3 · answered by frankomty 3 · 0 0

Hmm. Did people who saw the planes go in have mass hallucinations?

I have a Jewish friend who told me that some Arabs were saying that Jews were behind 9/11. I absolutely thought she was crazy and this was just paranoia in the Jewish community.
Imagine my shock when I heard this in Pakistan from Muslims that I respected.

No I don't think it was an inside job. I enjoy conspiracy theories as much as the next person, but look at the world around us - something like this was bound to happen. Let's talk about what possesses people to do this kind of thing and what we can do to prevent it in future.

2006-07-24 11:57:54 · answer #4 · answered by xamayca.com 4 · 0 0

Not a Chance!

If your definition of inside job means our own government having something to do with it, well yes I can see that as a possibility! Anything is possible with our government as it stands today.

But as for controlled demolition - There's only one thing I can say about that, ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND? What was so controlled about it? There was nothing controlled when it came to the damage and loss of life that was caused on 9/11

2006-07-24 10:24:39 · answer #5 · answered by ~**badboys_wife**~ 4 · 0 0

Ever hear of Occam's Razor? The simplest explanation is likely the correct one. Engineers have figured out how the planes could do it. Why insert conspiracies when they're not needed.

Besides, the terrorists tried explosives there about 10 years before, and it didn't work. Remember?

2006-07-24 10:21:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well after seeing the footage of WTC 7 I was curious. Also I can accept that its possible for a fire to take down a building but I don't understand how it did it perfectly and in less than 90 minutes...........I don't think a demo team could have done it as well as that plane did or as fast, that makes me think......

2006-07-24 10:25:56 · answer #7 · answered by The Angry Stick Man 6 · 0 0

Nope. There was NOTHING "controlled" about the way those Towers fell. -Even Bin Laden must've been astounded as to how well his evil plan worked. I don't think there are people smart enough "on the inside"- to plan & achieve such a diabolical act. There was too much (bad) luck involved. -THAT, & the law of unintended consequences...

2006-07-24 10:33:42 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0 0

Bush set that **** up.... you know it and I know it... I don't know why you even had to ask really. He wanted to create a crisis in America to make history for himself and to make it look like he's the answers to all our prayers... Our leader. When really it's nothing but bullshit... He'll do anything to creat a crisis in America to make it look like he cares about our nation and that war is the answer. The situation with New Orleans was an inside job too.... but you didn't ask about that.

2006-07-24 10:52:02 · answer #9 · answered by rosepassions 3 · 0 0

yes and no, because those towers are high traffic buildings and you never heard about any political officials or anyone in a high ranking position dying in 911. but they frequently visit the building daily. it just makes you wonder.

2006-07-24 10:25:23 · answer #10 · answered by egoodkis 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers