English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Obviously, everyone's got wide receivers, but who's not very deep in that position?

2006-07-24 09:47:01 · 12 answers · asked by Cassie 3 in Sports Football (American)

12 answers

49ers, Titans, Jets, Eagles, Browns, and the Saints all lack depth at this position

2006-07-24 09:52:35 · answer #1 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 0 1

There are several teams that are questionable at WR. There are 3 categories I would use to rank the WR's. The have's, the have-not's, and the rest.

The haves would be Indianapolis, Dallas, Carolina, Cincinatti, Detroit, Denver, and Arizona.

The Ravens have 2 solid starters but no depth at all. The Bills aren't too deep either. The Falcons are extremely thin at WR.

Then there's basically everyone else.

2006-07-24 11:21:52 · answer #2 · answered by St. Jimmy 3 · 0 0

Falcons have got to have the worst....Lions are still a little sketchy but they have some decent recievers, it has mostly been the QB I think over there. Recently...Pittsburg is running short on recievers...pretty much Ward for a guy to rely on. Vikings are definately in the mix for the worst as well.

Best would have to go to:
Indy, Arizona, Carolina, New Orleans, Denver, Cincinati, Washington, New York (Giants), and St Louis....but you didn't ask who was the best, I just thought I'd add a little ;) (I left Dallas out because odds are probably better that T.O. doesn't play for very long, leaving Glenn....and he's not that great actually)

2006-07-24 10:15:13 · answer #3 · answered by Carolina Kitten 6 · 0 0

Philadelphia Eagles

2006-07-24 11:30:30 · answer #4 · answered by palffy68 3 · 0 0

I would agree with most of what everyone else has said :D

Only thing is, that I think the Packers are better off then the Vikings WR wise. Donald Driver is a great player, and this year he is #1 on the depth chart. Look for an explosive season for him.

2006-07-24 10:13:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

49ers and the Falcons. The Falcons can win games on the ground the 49ers can't. Vernon Davis is a start but they need to look at guys like Ashley Lelee who are looking for a new team.

2006-07-25 06:56:26 · answer #6 · answered by Legal Eagle 6 · 0 0

I know the Pats are short at the wide receiver position. They do have very good Tight Ends and their running game should improve this year, so that will help.

2006-07-24 11:11:01 · answer #7 · answered by MPL 2 · 0 0

Saints have good depth in Horn, Bush (he's basically one), Stallworth, Haas, Henderson and Bethel Johnson.

The top teams? Patriots, Vikings are horribly short, Steelers (not lack of depth talent but receiving guys) and I would say the Packers are the worst out of the lower teams. The 'Niners are not worthy of any consideration as they are literally that bad.

2006-07-24 10:04:56 · answer #8 · answered by philliez01 3 · 0 0

The Tampa Bay Bucs and some other teams.

2006-07-24 11:03:10 · answer #9 · answered by badger180 5 · 0 0

Atlanta Falcons its whats gonna keep them from the Superbowl, and possibly the playoffs alone.Saints,Texans,Bills,Jets,Eagles, (the list goes on)

2006-07-24 09:50:29 · answer #10 · answered by marioistheshiz 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers