because as far as I can see by their looks and actions, that is the only difference I see, are their haircuts similar also ?
2006-07-24 07:39:42 · 18 answers · asked by gop_usa_nazis 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To bad you really do not have a clue about what you are talking about!
2006-07-24 07:42:17 · answer #1 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You must have been educated in public schools. The difference is that Hitler would have killed you if you said something bad about him. So what do the anti-war people think about us "invading" Europe and taking down Hitler? Did you know that the liberals in this country wanted us to stay out of the war? Time for you to eat you milk and cookies now. Run along.
2006-07-24 14:48:02 · answer #2 · answered by haterade 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Hitler was an honest to God war vet who won the Iron Cross 2d Class in WWII, while Bush managed to evade messy combat.
Actually, BC, it was a liberal, FDR, who wanted to involve the US in WWII from the outset, but he was prevented from doing so by the Neutrality Act. As it was, he managed to assisst GB via Lend Lease until Germany declared war on us in 1941.
Read a little history once in while. Fool.
2006-07-24 14:48:06 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. October 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By comparing ANYTHING currently happening in the USA to the atrocities of Nazi Germany is to undermine the Hell of the concentrations camps, gas chambers and mass graves!
Even if Abu Ghraib was part of Bush's plan, the cruelty there paled in comparison to Auschwitz!
Stick to facts. By making such ridiculous comparisons, you lose an opportunity to share REAL, VALID complaints against Bush.
2006-07-24 20:37:15 · answer #4 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually no, Hitler was kind of mentally disturbed during his childhood days. So you cannot be surprised by his actions. But Bush was just an alcoholic. People always say never trust an alcoholic. May be it's just true.
2006-07-24 14:46:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a dummy with Hitler's soul
2006-07-24 14:50:33 · answer #6 · answered by Arsalan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no comparison, this is a crackpot question to incite the lowest of liberal life form and start the bashing. Why do you take up space with this garbage?
2006-07-24 14:46:29 · answer #7 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dont forget they have different color hair also.
Hitler was much cooler, he had the suport of his people where as bush only has a 32% approval rating.
2006-07-24 14:45:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your compression is irresponsible and sad. By making these flippant and cynical statements you dishonor the people who died in Hitlers death camps and those who died to stop him. Why don't you crawl back under your little rock.
2006-07-24 14:46:28 · answer #9 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well...Bush isn't commiting Genocide in his home country and he isn't a dictator, just a president...So, no, a mustache is not the only difference.
2006-07-24 14:43:31 · answer #10 · answered by Lupus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's wrong with you? Did you not get enough hugs as a child?George Soros is paying way too much,if this is the best you can do.
2006-07-24 14:47:37 · answer #11 · answered by Kennyp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋