Iran doesnt want to get nuked, so it will not push Israel that far. It will push Israel as far as it can, tho.
2006-07-24 08:16:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by jack f 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
The odds for Israel being forced into nuclear war by mullahs in Iran are less than 1% within a year.
2006-07-24 06:28:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. Iran is not ready yet. The trick is not letting them get ready.
The task will not be easy, as Iranians got smarter after Afghanistan and Iraq. They will not give an excuse to attack them before they will be ready to destroy Israel first, USA - next, all the rest following, and by the end - other "friendly" Sunni countries. And the peace arrive, but not many people will enjoy it. Help to stop the threat as we still have some time...
2006-07-24 06:29:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by nesher9 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
conflict with Iran may well be a disaster. conflict with Iran is worse via a great way than Iraq. Iraq is smaller and quite often flat. Iran is commonly mountainous, and that they have dug many tunnels and caves. in addition they have rockets that our deliver defenses can not seize, meaning our military may well be in serious jeopardy. Please undergo in innovations that we are dropping the conflict in Afghanistan as a results of fact of Iraq. If we've yet yet another conflict, we'd lose the two contemporary wars, and the conflict with Iran/Syria/North Korea. To combat this sort of conflict, a draft may well be unquestionably mandatory. the army is already stretched to the cut back. we are utilising kin coast shelter in the Persian Gulf. So, do you like your nephews and nieces and young little ones to pass get blown up? What probability is Iran to us? They undergo weapons centers inspections. they have reported, THE REGIME in Israel might desire to pass, that's something we are saying approximately them continuously. we are saying worse! final, what if China and Russia, allies of Iran enter a conflict that we create under the banner of lies (like Iraq)? they may well be justly intervening, and we'd be the belligerent skill. China ought to wreak havoc on our forces. we ought to lose our finished protection stress. the U. S. could be invaded. It has many, many enemies. Resorting to nuclear conflict isn't a particularly state of affairs, distinctly as quickly as we are the reason of WW3.
2016-11-02 21:50:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope that Iran can be subdued before that becomes necessary. However that may be done. Iran's over ripe for change (rotting in fact) - time for the nazis...I mean mullahs...to be knocked on the head.
2006-07-24 06:17:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by srekwah 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it will be within 2 years..For certain before Iran gets one ready
2006-07-24 06:13:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by dwh12345 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel will back off, first. They only bet on a sure thing.
2006-07-24 06:19:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no chance. they will be (the mullahs) remove from power by their own people before it happened.
2006-07-24 06:17:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by zilber 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i say nuke both country's and kill every thing and everyone left alive and that would be the end of both dumb *** country's and there stupid wars
2006-07-24 06:17:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋