The 14th Amendment,(Equal Protection)?

Question

Here's my Question under the 14th Amendment/ If they can use Video in a jail /Booking Area, and convict someone for assaulting an officer!!/ shouldn't you be able to VINDICATE SOMEONE BY USING VIDEO in another Facility,(jail)/ So an Officer can't Fabricate the Commission of an offence. So What I'm saying is under Equal Protection if your in a booking area in a jail you should also be able to be vindicated to,by Video /Right EQUAL PROTECTION plz give me your input on the situation

Answer 1

YES.

The Department of corruption should have public internet web cast access so that the people can make sure thier family members are ok.

I know they currently employ the technology to facilitate visits.

Video, if proved to be genuine and unaltered, can be used both ways.

I would like to take it a step further.

I think that humans should be able to get cival warrants to enter and search any facility, government or private, upon show of proof. The same process they go through for criminal warrents could be applied with the same rules. Given the amount of false charges and warrants out there we should be able to show due diligence and go in and bust the dirty cops.

Answer 2

This is more of an evidence question, not one about the 14th Amendment. Equal protection has to do with the law classifying people/things. For instance, classifications based on race are strictly scrutinized, while those based on income are subject to very loose scrutiny.

I don't know much about the law of evidence, so I can't answer your question further than to say that you must base your argument on something regarding evidence, not equal protection as per the 14th Amendment.

Answer 3

The video is simply evidence supporting your claim. It has nothing to do with equal protection.

Answer 4

I would say this is legally true but you would have a hard time to subpoena the video evidence. most of it has to do with the fact that went the evidence is not strong enough to convict that they make deals with hard to fight fabrications.

Answer 5

I am semi sure of your question & you could have your attorney subpeona the tape. It is rare inside a station that an officier would make such a mistake. Too many witnesses - they know the law if the criminals do not.

Answer 6

Hmm.. it relies upon. in the experience that they are in basic terms courting for sexual crap or because all and distinctive else is courting, that is stupid. yet in the experience that they are easily mature and somewhat favor to get to understand the fellow and be with them, it really is positive. yet I actual do not imagine 14-15 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous adult males are mature sufficient or waiting for a sturdy courting. a number of them are. i replaced into 14, quite a lot 15 when I went out with my first boyfriend and he replaced into 16. this does not make me a ho, i replaced into in basic terms more suitable mature than adult males my age and that i easily loved the guy I dated and wanted to get to understand him.

Answer 7

It means you won´t have to appear in court or be processed if they see you as an equal member of society, that´s just about it.