can Liberals really justify compairing the President to Hitler or the Nazi party?

Question

Or is it really just a convenient way to hide the fact that they have no alternatives, no solutions, in short nothing really to say? After all it is very easy to say “He is a Nazi” but a little more difficult to say “A better way to handle this situation would be. . .”

Answer 1

And as you can read, we don't all feel that way. I answered that question, and hopefully shed some light on the destructiveness of asking such a question.

Answer 2

NO not at all these are two different leaders and in two different times .HAD hitler waited just 5 more years we might all be speaking german .
NEVER in america will we speak like bush i hope .
EVERYTIME he opens his mouth i wait for something stupid to come out .HE could not lead a pride of starving lions to a good meal trailing a tenderloin from a freshly butcherd steer .
Do you really believe democrats have nothing to say or any solutions .
IF you keep saying it long enough people will begin to believe it .
MOST people are after all going to wake up shower get dressed hop in the car and head to work day in and day out for 40 or so years .
THEY will never question anything or want more then they can get during a normal work week .THIS is what the american dream has become .
A SAFE job working for the state with benefits who will all vote there paychecks before the well being of america , complain about anyone who threatens to level government pay and benefits till average americans can have the equivilent and enjoy there 3 bdrm 2 bath home in the suburbs .ALL the while complaining about inflation and the price of everything going up .
THEY have never even considered that they are the reason we have the inflation in the first place .

Answer 3

Liberals can "rationalize" anything. Lying under oath to a Federal Grand Jury is just fine as long as it is about SEX. The US Senate said so. Oh, and being a Democrat helps. No concept of "lying is lying" and when done to a Grand Jury, it is probably meant to obstruct justice. Ironically, exactly what Nixon did but without lying under oath. We really do treat everyone equally under the law, don't we???

Bush told them that the best intel available, which included identical statements from Reagan, Clinton, and Gore, indicated that Iraq had WMD and they were a potential threat to us and the rest of the world.

Bush lie, men died and Clinton is an honorable man.

And as far as diplomacy, just EXACTLY how much would it take to satisfy our 14 year old expert on foreign affairs. Did you know, FDR was actively engaged in DIPLOMACY when the Japanese bombed Pearle Harbor.

I personally think 10 years, countless (worthless) UN resolutions, and an additional 14 months for Saddam to clean up or hide anything. Assuming, as I do, that Clinton couldn't have been wrong about the WMDs.

Just to get one more thing straight, I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am registered as "No political affiliation". I might have actually voted for Bush if he didn't have all the pesky liberal views.

Answer 4

Ha ha. Very funny. George Bush is so scared of the Jews and Israel's lobby that he doesn't dare pick his nose without their permission. He'll flip the bird at some reporter, but he won't do anything that the Jewish media bosses would really take a dislike to.

Notice how everything Bush says about Israel contains language loaded in Israel's favor? He does it to an extreme that goes beyond even Yahoo's titles for AP wire releases.

Adolf Hitler wasn't afraid of the Jews. Hitler took the key power positions away from the Jews who were occupying them, and gave them to real Germans, instead. Hitler's gestures of defiance were aimed at the powerful international Jewish bankers, who threatened him with war unless he accepted their loans and got the Germans into debt.

In other words, Hitler really was on the side of his people. All the nasty stuff you hear about him, you hear by way of the Jewish media, and you need to consider the source.

I'm not sure why the media bosses are turning against Bush at present. Bush has been their loyal servant since he was elected President. Maybe he failed to do them some service they required. Maybe he said something to offend them. But whatever the reason, I doubt that Bush will ever dare oppose his Jewish masters openly, as Hitler did.

Liberals call anybody in power whose policies they don't like "a Hitler," just like they call anybody with whom they they lose an argument "a racist." Coming from liberals, these labels mean nothing.

Answer 5

Throwing around the word "Nazi" or the name "Hitler" is a childish name calling exercise. Only when they are too lazy to really spend time reading and studying the problem, do they start the name calling.
Illusions to WW2 are shocking because of what happened to millions of people and liberals are looking for shock value not substance.
If the Liberals have a real plan of what to do to protect us from this militant evil in the world I would like to hear it.
I'm waiting for an answer.

Answer 6

A better way to handle this situation would be to research Bush's family tree and it's history of "social climbers".

Then you'll realize just how the term "Nazi" relates.

You probably don't understand what a 'social climber' is, coming from the deep south. You'd have to research that term, too.

Really....do the research. It's amazing.


To NotaDummyRat:
You ARE a Dummy Rat. I'm a Lib and I'm Jewish.
Go figger.

Answer 7

Comparing Bush to Hitler is the Libs way of insulting the president. This tactic is not going to win them a lot of votes this fall or in 2008. In fact, it may even alienate some democrats who know that this is way over the line.

As you infer, this group of Democrats have no idea how to come up with a better idea, they just want to tear down.

Answer 8

It is a very strong accusation, I agree. One way I could compare President Bush to Hitler, though, is how they both made decisions they felt best for the people, not because the people thought it best. Most polls hold that about 70% of Americans are supportive of stem cell research, however, the president made the decision to not federally fund this research because he was saving America from stepping over a moral boundary. In other words, he made the decision for us, he dictated how America should be run according to his views, not America's.

Answer 9

A better way to handle this situation would be to get a court order to tap my phone and stop doing it like a nazi would.

And seriously it's a joke when you people yell at libs for pointing fingers. It's your watch. You have the whitehouse, the congress, and the court. How can you not expect anyone to point fingers.

Libs have solutions. You just don't like them.

Answer 10

Let's not forget that the nazis wanted to have direct control over Europe and then the world's people where Bush wants the world's people to have control over their own lives.
Libs today want to make the country so that people not only need less control, but have less control over what happens in their daily life.
The liberal government operates on the belief that their citizens are not responsible, talented or even smart enough to have control over thier lives and money. hence the out rageous taxes they propose.
A conservative approach puts the power to live in the hands of the people.

Answer 11

.......to dismiss generalizations, political affiliations and think about what the real problems are and how they relate to the human condition. There is a dilemma between freedom and security...the democracies have the ability to choose one over the other, especially in a time when technology and population crowd time and space. Personally, being young I would choose freedom over security, however, being a father and husband I would sacrifice some freedom for that security, not for myself but, for those that I care about. The problem is, who is to keep those who provide so-called "security" in check. It is attractive for the ego to adhere to the (POWER-SICKNESS) as I like to call it especially in today's world where we teach young boys that violence and emotional suppression is acceptable. Meanwhile girls are expected to be thinner and thinner, plastic...more and more materialistic. Advertising/ Media has kept us so busy with ourselves that we have no idea how to solve the issue that you question.