who will go down in history as being worse - BUSH or HITLER ?

Question

who will go down in history as being worse - BUSH or HITLER ?

Hitler invaded lots of country and killed lots of people.

Bush invaded lots of country and killed lots of people and is killing lots of people in his own country such as he did in New Orleans and by not stopping Global warming.

So, which one will be remembered as being worse ?

Answer 1

are you f-ing serious!! you should stop hugging your tree long enough to realize 1 person cannot stop global warming.
Hitler was a dic"k"tator...bush is just a dick.

Answer 2

Did you escape from a mental institution?

Hitler was bent on exterminating every Jew in the world. He managed to succeed in killing millions.

What are these lots of countries that you refer to which Mr. Bush has invaded? I only know of 2.

If we listen to your crackpot ravings I guess we are to believe that Mr. Bush went to New Orleans, called up a Hurricane out of nowhere, and then directed it at the city. Guess that is not a far stretch of the imagination for someone who believes that one man can change the climate for a whole planet.

All I can say is you really need to get off the drugs because crack kills.

I like thoughtful discourse even when it's critical, but your conclusions show a complete lack of touch with reality.

I normally try to avoid personal attacks on other posters as I believe it serves no good purpose, but in your case an exception is required.

Answer 3

OMG, are you seriously asking this question? I know I'm wasting my time, but I get several impressions from this question of yours:
1) You must be young, either chronologically or mentally/emotionally.
2) You OBVIOUSLY have not studied history.
3) You don't know the first thing about the war in Iraq, or what really happened with Hurricane Katrina, or global warming.
So. I'm going to waste my time, and educate you a little bit. These are facts, not tainted by politics. These are things I KNOW to be true from people who remember Hitler, and people who know exactly what's going on in Iraq. As a treat, I'm also going to include some information on "global warming" and Hurricane Katrina for free.
Let's start with Hitler.
Hitler invaded Poland in violation of the Versailles Treaty, which was signed after WWI. He was also in violation of the treaty by manufacturing weapons, and building the German military. When Hitler was in charge, the German people were afraid of doing anything besides going along with his decisions. Anyone who dared speak out was summarily executed, usually with their whole family.
Have you ever spoken to a German who remembers what it was like under Hitler? Have you ever seen Auschwitz, or Dachau? Have you ever even been to Europe? Somehow, I doubt it.
I have, all three of those. So I can guarantee that Hitler was worse in that regard.
As for the war in Iraq, let's talk about Hussein. This is a man who was in violation of the treaty signed at the conclusion of the Gulf War. The treaty decreed that he could not, under any circumstances, manufacture chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons. It also decreed that he was to submit to regular UN inspections to make sure that he was complying.
Do you know what Saddam did? He used the treaty as toilet paper, figuratively speaking, by not allowing the UN inspectors in. The UN passed SEVENTEEN resolutions against Hussein, for noncompliance.
Most of the killings taking place in Iraq is directly due to the insurgents, who don't want to see a democracy formed. If you're referring to the deaths of the soldiers, let me give you some math.
If you consider that there has been an average of about 160,000 troops in the Iraq theater of operations during the last 24 months, and a total of about 2500 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 per month.
The death rate in Washington D.C. is 80.6 gun related deaths per 100,000 per month. This means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in our nation's capitol, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, than you are by serving in Iraq.
Is President Bush at fault for those also?
Saddam was also firing on OUR aircraft, which was enforcing the no-fly zone. Now, if you look at what Hitler did, and compare that to Hussein, you have a closer match.
As for what Bush has done, the first claim is covered. He did not "invade" Iraq, because Iraq was NOT innocent. The only other country he "invaded" was Afghanistan, which was where Osama bin Laden was reportedly hiding.
Moving on to Hurricane Katrina. Did you know that the damage done to Mississippi was just as extensive? And yet...they didn't have as many problems there, even in the densely populated cities. Know what the difference is? Mississippi was PREPARED. Their state government took care of them, which is as it should be.
Louisiana, on the other hand, DID NOT. On top of that, they refused federal aid, right up until the levee broke. Then we got aid down there as quickly as possible. HOWEVER, when roads are washed out, it takes some time to get anywhere. Which is why things got so bad. Also remember that it is NOT up to the federal government to force people to evacuate. The citizens who stayed CHOSE to stay. Perhaps the state government should be asked why THEY didn't do more.
BTW, recent scientific studies have proven that global warming is pretty much BS. The world goes through stages. During the Middle Ages, the Earth saw a mini-Ice Age. The Earth is now compensating for that. It'll start to cool down in a few years, and then the process will start all over.
Therefore, the answer is Hitler. By a longshot. Do some research. You'll find that everything I said is true.

Answer 4

Have you ever read a book called QB VII? I can't remember the authors name, but find it, and read it. There is no comparison between Hitler and our president. President Bush hasn't invaded "lots of country", and he hasn't ordered the killing of "lots of people". As far as Katrina, what would you have had him do? Are you honestly so naive that you can hold one man responsible for the damage done by a hurricane? I think this will go down as one of the worst questions I have seen on Yahoo Answers. Thanks.

Answer 5

They are both allowing the murder of people who did nothing wrong. Hitler was a psycho and so is Bush. In the end Bush will probably contribute to more deaths than Hitler did. Sharon and Olmert need to be added to this list.

Answer 6

you got you facts screwed up I'm no Bush supporter but to compare him to the worst mass murderer in the history of man is insane. Bush responded to an attack on this country which allot of people are forgetting. Hitler just attacked to attack. Hitler sent 6 million people to their deaths. bush won't reach that number even if he stayed in office for another 20 years. you should read and learn the fact's before you rant and throw Hitlers name around like it's OK. i would take Bush 1 million times before i would even look in the direction of evil Hitler.

Answer 7

Depends on who's writing the history book. Different countries categorize people diffferently. While Americans may say Hitler was the worst, people of the middle east may say Bush. It depends on who you're talking to, because everyone has been affected differently by these people.

In my opinion? Hitler, only because he was inhumane and killed millions of people simply on the belief that because they were a different religion or had a different hair color than what he considered ideal that they were unworthy of life.

Answer 8

C'mon, are you serious? Hitler killed 6 million people for pleasure. Even though I don't agree with the war in Iraq, it's pretty stupid to compare Bush to Hitler.

Answer 9

I would say Bush because Hitler may have been evil and crazy but at least his country was doing great and did not get ruined till the world war.

Answer 10

Hitler. Please don't casually throw his name around like that. I hate Bush, but we have never again, and hopefully never will again, seen a comparison to Hitler. Try to find other ways to get your point across. You have offended more people than you know, with this question. Are you afraid the secret police are on theri way to your house right now to take you to a death camp, just for speaking out against your goverment. If you answered no, then you have answered your question.

Answer 11

Bush is gaining, really, really fast.

And the world was still here after Hitler.

Only time will tell.

I guess George wins if there is no more history.

I believe we have the best man for the job.

If the job is to end the world.

At least there will be no conservatives in Heaven.

I read His words and teachings.

Jesus is obviously a Liberal.