I support this ONLY with one stipulation. No one weighing over 200 pounds can wear it.
2006-07-24 03:59:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I see nothing wrong with wearing just a g-string or less. There is nothing wrong with looking at a good looking person in the nude. Maby that would make people take better care of themselves.
2006-07-24 12:08:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by bob h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows? Society's attitude to "scantily dressed" women is getting more and more relaxed. I live in the southeastern USA(close to Atlanta,GA) and the attitude towards scanty dress tends to be relaxed. I guess the climate has to do with that, particularly the hot long summers.
2006-07-24 11:08:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by liker_of_minnesota 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yea. now they get butt implant instead of boobs implant. next step would be showing butt cleavage instead of boob cleavage. Before you know it, women will be protesting for the right to go on the street topless just because men can. Then men would be like, well, if they can go out topless, why can't we go out naked? After that, women would be like," well, we have class, we don't go out naked, so we wear g-string." There you go.
2006-07-24 12:14:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by musi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that a G-string will be too much, I think that they be wearing nothing but a shoe lace.
2006-07-24 11:03:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Soldier 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lucky a g-string.... I think they're going to be naked! poor me I will be old! LOL
2006-07-24 11:00:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sweet Papayita :) 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on who's wearing them...
2006-07-24 11:00:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hugo Reyes 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The guys will like that.
2006-07-24 10:59:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by cheeky chic 379 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
God I hope so.
2006-07-24 10:58:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by onapizzadiet 4
·
0⤊
0⤋