Saddam has decided to go on hunger strike and cannot appear in court - the court is proceeding without him at present.....does George make a good stand in??
2006-07-24 03:29:44 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
yes good idea you wouldn't be able to tell the difference
PS yes there both crazy dictators
2006-07-24 03:40:11 · answer #1 · answered by The Wanderer 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Whatever Saddam has done, it is not right that his lawyers are being murdered. We need to give him a fair trial to show that we have higher standards of justice than he does. Also if we want peace in the middle east, we need to show that we believe in the Law and in justice and that the Courts are where we expect to see this demonstrated.
If George W. Bush has done anything illegal he should be arrested, so far as I know, no case has yet been made. Who knows what the future holds.
2006-07-24 03:37:55 · answer #2 · answered by Beebee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question makes no sense except for the fact your just a bush hater, Saddam murdered millions of people, hunger strike is to good for him, mutilate him alive like he's done to millions of families, Thankfully the US isnt the court that saddam is in otherwise he would never have made it to the end of the trial.......
2006-07-24 03:35:24 · answer #3 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dont be silly
George is the one bringing charges!
Saddam has been on hunger strike for 17 days but is now being force fed by tube. Silly old git.
2006-07-24 03:33:41 · answer #4 · answered by super_star 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does it count number selection!!! he's president, voted in by the persons of u.s. to represent u.s. and its moves. He does what he feels precise as likely the numerous sensible guy contained contained in the global. all persons damage the regulation, next time you're going purely 1km an hour over the price shrink on your motor vehicle your breaking the regulation... what's regulation, is it in position to guard others, if the answer to it truly is for particular and Bush believes that he did what he did to guard others then NO he did no longer damage the regulation.
2016-10-15 03:45:06 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think so why should Sadam have a US represenative stand in for him. I am sure his lawyer is keeping him informed. If all things are done by street justice law he will be murdered by a Arab, or will starve to death anyway. Or maybe the Taliban will off him.
2006-07-24 03:44:32 · answer #6 · answered by barearl@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd prefer George Galloway
2006-07-24 03:56:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And you're another dumbfucl<.
Checked your profile numbnuts. Looks like you love to ask questions about penises. Do you have a thing for them?
Go back to your penises and stay out of politics because you don't have a clue.
Is your name really womanblondie?
2006-07-24 03:33:52 · answer #8 · answered by Munster 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask the Kurds.
2006-07-24 03:32:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-07-24 03:32:58 · answer #10 · answered by Nothing to say? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋