http://www.compfused.com/directlink/149/
2006-07-24 03:28:48 · 22 answers · asked by my brain hurts 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
That's not real and even if it ways it was from a long time ago cause she was in shape and looked pretty!
2006-07-24 03:34:43 · answer #1 · answered by kalexander05 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, this looks as phony as a three dollar bill. Aside from that if it IS real, it must have been taken a hella' long time ago because Brittey is actually not a fat sow in this picture.
Also, she's pregnant again, so it couldn't be a recent pic.
2006-07-24 10:53:22 · answer #2 · answered by staygold 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like you never changed your underwear during a movie premier on the red carpet! c'mon give the girl a break! plus it's sexy as hell...
2006-07-24 10:33:33 · answer #3 · answered by VetteLeo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish. Then again I think I'll let Fetterline have all the fun with that.
2006-07-24 16:18:32 · answer #4 · answered by kman252 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's pretty much been caught doing everything....except that...she's a little on the dumb side...but give her some credit! She married....a wanna-be rapper.....ok...i take that back.
2006-07-24 10:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by sleepykoala 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck, I bet we've seen her naked more than her husband. Same goes for Paris, minus the husband.
2006-07-24 10:32:14 · answer #6 · answered by S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's clearly Photoshopped. (Not that she hasn't been photographed in compromising positions, I just don't believe that was one of them.)
2006-07-24 10:36:06 · answer #7 · answered by Ancespiration 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whoah - that is HILARIOUS - i just spat a mouthful of coca-cola all over my moniter! Cheers! LMAO...
2006-07-24 10:54:23 · answer #8 · answered by Mrsdanieljackson 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would mean that skank wore underwear at some point. HA!
2006-07-24 10:32:17 · answer #9 · answered by bigred8882 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This picture is not only old, but photoshopped, lol.
2006-07-24 13:19:15 · answer #10 · answered by Rogue610 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋