History will record the Bush presidency as the most evil, corrupt, incompetent ever (to date). He and his evil twins, LimpDick Cheney and DumbDon Rumsfeld, have destroyed America's reputation as a world leader and global peacekeeper.
His administration, in collusion with the most corrupt, cowardly, incompetent U.S. Congress in history, has illegally and unconstitutionally invaded another sovereign nation that did not threaten, provoke or attack the U.S.A., then slaughtered tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens for no justifiable reason (not to mention being responsible for the deaths of more than 2,500 U.S. soldiers, so far). Yes, I'd have to agree; George Bush is the worst President ever! -RKO-
2006-07-24 01:29:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes he is, by far!
I never thought I would see anyone worse than Nixon, until Reagan, where little stuck, and then comes George! How anyone can say he isn't is beyond me!
Of course he is the only criminal ever elected and has the lowest IQ of any presidant in history, Compare his 91 with Bill Clintons 182!
"In early 2004, an informal survey of 415 historians conducted by the nonpartisan History News Network found that eighty-one percent considered the Bush administration a "failure." Among those who called Bush a success, many gave the president high marks only for his ability to mobilize public support and get Congress to go along with what one historian called the administration's "pursuit of disastrous policies." In fact, roughly one in ten of those who called Bush a success was being facetious, rating him only as the best president since Bill Clinton -- a category in which Bush is the only contestant.
The lopsided decision of historians should give everyone pause. Contrary to popular stereotypes, historians are generally a cautious bunch. We assess the past from widely divergent points of view and are deeply concerned about being viewed as fair and accurate by our colleagues. When we make historical judgments, we are acting not as voters or even pundits, but as scholars who must evaluate all the evidence, good, bad or indifferent. Separate surveys, conducted by those perceived as conservatives as well as liberals, show remarkable unanimity about who the best and worst presidents have been.
Historians do tend, as a group, to be far more liberal than the citizenry as a whole -- a fact the president's admirers have seized on to dismiss the poll results as transparently biased. One pro-Bush historian said the survey revealed more about "the current crop of history professors" than about Bush or about Bush's eventual standing. But if historians were simply motivated by a strong collective liberal bias, they might be expected to call Bush the worst president since his father, or Ronald Reagan, or Nixon. Instead, more than half of those polled -- and nearly three-fourths of those who gave Bush a negative rating -- reached back before Nixon to find a president they considered as miserable as Bush. The presidents most commonly linked with Bush included Hoover, Andrew Johnson and Buchanan. Twelve percent of the historians polled -- nearly as many as those who rated Bush a success -- flatly called Bush the worst president in American history. And these figures were gathered before the debacles over Hurricane Katrina, Bush's role in the Valerie Plame leak affair and the deterioration of the situation in Iraq. Were the historians polled today, that figure would certainly be higher."
2006-07-24 08:27:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Of the Presidents in my lifetime, I think Jimmy Carter was the worst. His lack of understanding of Economic policies caused us to have high unemployment, high interest rates, and inflation that this country had never seen before.
He spent just about all of his time trying to broker a peace deal with Israel and her enemies. Much of that time was wasted.
George Bush's economic polices got us out of a recession and helped spur the best economic growth this country ever had.
President Bush's leadership helped the country through the 9/ll attack and he took the fight to the enemy. Taking on the enemy is something Bill Clinton was afraid to do.
2006-07-24 08:24:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Having lived since days of Harry Truman as president. I must say Bush lacks knowledge to be president the shoot from the hip and bring them on tells us how much he understands the importance of being president.
I thought Reagan was joke after all he was an actor playing president. Nancy was in charge.
Jimmy Carter was an outsider who could not grasp the rein of power as president. Has done more since he left office to show what great man he was.
2006-07-24 10:02:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by murraystate69 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutly NOT! He is one of the better ones we have had. I hate to see what happens when the next president comes along and doesnt have the guts to stand up and do what Bush has done. Look at whats going on with Lebanon and Israeli. The first Pres Bush wanted to blow them away when he was Pres. But NOOOOOO.. the democrates and everyone else were against it. If he had done it then, there would be no mess now.
2006-07-24 08:30:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know that he's the worst president ever; I think there's been some that have been comparably corrupt, and we may see extremely worse in the future, but he's definitely the worst since Nixon, I'll guarantee that.
2006-07-24 09:03:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope ! Jimmy Carter, the peanut farmer was !
What was the country thinking when that guy was voted into
office. He turned out to be awful in office and alot of things
were left unfinished. He really was ineffective as President.
2006-07-24 08:30:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by babo02350 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
hell yeah george bush is the worst president ever. unless you're rich and white, of course.
2006-07-24 08:23:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by George G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just look at what has been accomplished under his term and you won't have to ask! I'm not pro democrat, but for people who keep saying that Clinton was the worst, I just have two words.... Federal Deficit.
2006-07-24 08:26:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nah. Millard Fillmore gets my vote. At least the Republican party nominated Dubya for a second term.
2006-07-24 08:50:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by FiatJusticia 3
·
0⤊
0⤋