English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

note relativisticly time dilation formula is dependend on velocity.where gravitational time depends on gravity.
any correlations between them.?

2006-07-24 01:14:06 · 21 answers · asked by goring 6 in Science & Mathematics Physics

21 answers

First, does physical time have a particular direction? The answer is, yes. The reason for this is that everything in our universe (including ourselves, of course) is composed of physical time. Were this not true, then there would be no manner by which all things could relate. The equation for a field of physical time is part of the physics trilogy, which is: E = mc2, m = E/c2, and c2 = E/m. The last equation is that for a field of physicl time, or a gravitational field.

What this means is, everything is formed of physical time. So, then were every mass and energy form reduced to their lowest form, it all would become one-dimensional and physical time would cease to exist altogether in our universe. There could exist time no longer. Until that event happens, though, everything moves in the direction of "c". It is this value that causes mass to proceed from the present into the past. This is also the value as which it happens.

Next, the relationship between mass velocity and gravitational attraction. In order to consider how this works, we need to consider two seperate masses. The first mass will be that moving through space at the speed of light minus 25 mps. The second mass will be that found in our planet, 0.717 miles from the core point. Both are actually moving exactly the same in relation to the value of "c".

The mass in outer space will have had its mass converted from being three equal dimensions of mass/energy toward becoming a mass that has a great deal of energy in its forward direction, which energy value is proportional to the energy loss at right angles to that direction. The reason for this is found in the frequency trilogy:

hf = E, that shows electromagnetic energy has its energy value according to its frequency.

hf = mk, which is kinetic energy of mass. Because mass is composed of this kind of energy (electromagnetic, it operates according to the same values. This also demonstrates why mass becomes shortened in direction of travel. The lines of frequency become increased in that direction, thus shortened in order to demonstrate the condition of greater energy.

hf = c, is the basis of all of the above. It appears that this value may be that of "h".

Now comes the interesting part. The moving mass in outer space may be directly exchanged with the one 0.717 miles from the center of our planet, were they the same size. The one in outer space is changing space in accordance to that of time, while the mass in earth is having its value becoming a mass that is changing time according to mass, c2 = E/m.

http://timebones.blogspot.com explains this more fully, Were you to scroll down to "The Problem and Repair of Relativity" there is an easy to read three page reason.

2006-07-24 05:03:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Time appears to have a direction to us - the past lies behind us, and is fixed and incommutable, while the future lies ahead and is not necessarily fixed. Yet the majority of the laws of physics don't provide this arrow of time. The exceptions include the Second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy must increase over time; the cosmological arrow of time, which points away from the Big Bang, and the radiative arrow of time, caused by light only traveling forwards in time. In particle physics, there is also the weak arrow of time, from CPT symmetry, and also measurement in Quantum Mechanics .

Physical processes at the microscopic level are either entirely or mostly time symmetric, meaning that the theoretical statements that describe them remain true if the direction of time is reversed; yet when we describe things at the macroscopic level it often appears that this is not the case: there is an obvious direction (or flow) of time. An arrow of time is anything that exhibits such time-asymmetry.

2006-07-24 04:08:46 · answer #2 · answered by wilde.reader 2 · 0 0

Time has only one direction - straight forward.

Time always increases, and there is no way to reverse it. Time is an afetrmath of the Universe expansion and always goes to the direction of the expansion.

Since gravity is the only long-distance force, there is a slight distortion of that expansion near large masses, meaning that there is also the distorsion of time. That's why time can't be measured iside the black hole (it's gravity produces such a distortion, that time literally goes in circles around the core of the black hole).

The correlation between relativistic and gravitational time exists only at controlled environment, i.e. outside the black holes and such singularities. But, since it is very complex calculus to determine it here, try to find books about it.

2006-07-24 02:17:07 · answer #3 · answered by Vlada M 3 · 0 0

Time is a "scalar" which means it has a size (or magnitude) but no direction. Quantities like velocity are "vectors" and have a magnitude (for velocity the magnitude is speed) and a direction.

The relativistic time dilation depends on the relative speed of two reference frames. It doesn't matter which direction the two frames are moving relative to each other.

In relativity, gravity is indistinguishable from acceleration. Again, the time dilation depends on the magnitude of the acceleration of one frame relative to the other (or on the magnitude of the acceleration of gravity), but not on direction.

These two dilations are independent, you can have one without the other, or both acting. There is no directional dependence for either.

2006-07-24 02:30:45 · answer #4 · answered by not_2_worried 2 · 0 0

Curiously, time has only one direction in the everyday world (forward), but in the quantum world time goes both forward and back. For example, a neutrino particle is just an anti-neutrino particle going backward in time. I think it was Richard Feynman who first pointed this out, but it is widely accepted as true.

Google "Feynman diagrams." Also, David Bohm and Ilya Prigogine have contributed to understanding the direction of time. However, in my opinion neither have adequately explained why time has a single direction in the macrocosm, and either direction in the microcosm.

2006-07-24 01:44:44 · answer #5 · answered by stanheidrich 2 · 0 0

1

2017-02-20 11:00:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The theory of relativity is based on the principle that all laws of Physics must be the same in any reference frame.

Time is scalar quantity; it has no direction.

All physical quantities can increase or decrease; it does not mean that they have direction.

Time is not changing with direction. Therefore time has no direction.

The past , present and future is not referring direction.

2006-07-24 04:07:20 · answer #7 · answered by Pearlsawme 7 · 0 0

I hate their song. They shouldn't also be labeled as a boy band. honestly one of their songs thoroughly took the starting up guitar riff of The conflict's (english rock band) song " ought to I stay or ought to i go". BQ: i do not dislike the man, however the singer's song I dislike the most is the band relaxing. BQ2: Too many to ensure on from

2016-11-25 21:14:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As per Einstein's theory of relativity the frame is four dimensional with time as one dimension. So time has direction as per the theory.

2006-07-24 01:22:09 · answer #9 · answered by funnynice2006 3 · 0 0

actually time has two directions according to theory of relativity. the time always move forward but it can move backwards also. u just imagine if time were to move backward then everything would go backwards.

2006-07-24 01:43:40 · answer #10 · answered by abhishek b 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers