English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In the 2 world war countries that where ocupied by the Nazies had resistence group such as the French resistence who killed Germans because the Germans occupied their land England and the USA supplied there resistrence groups with arms. So if it is ailright for Eruopean countries that are ocupied by a foregn power to kill people belonging to that power why is it not ok for Arabs to kill jews who are occuping their land. Also if Western countries can supply occupied Europen countries with arms to kill the occupiers why can not Iran and Syria like wise supply arms to the people who are occupied

2006-07-24 00:40:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

6 answers

You do not seem to have a basic understanding of history. The Nazis did not exist in World War I. There was a lot of fighting and wholesale killing going on in WWI, but no one country took over another country as the Germans did in WWII. Killing is never all right.
"Arabs" are not a country. Arabs live in several different countries. Arabs do not own Israel. The Israelis own Israel. No invading army, after WWII, took over Israel. The United Nations ceded Israel to Jews who wanted to emigrate to Israel.
Israel is a sovereign nation and has the right to exist. The Israelis are fighting people who want to kill all of the Jews and take the land. Killing is not all right.
Your main premise is wrong. "Arabs" as a race, do not own Israel and do not have a right to try to take it by force.
During WWII, Germany invaded and overtook France. The Nazis had no right to do that. Some French resisted, some French collaborated with the Nazis, some French did nothing. France was a sovereign nation taken over by another country, and that was wrong.

2006-07-24 00:55:14 · answer #1 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0 0

first of all it is never ok for anyone to kill another person. What is happening with our fellow men and women overseas is a tragedy. We as a world are going to destroy mankind if this does not stop. We all live under the same devine being no matter what name you attach to it. If you truly believe then you would not be killing people like women andchildren just for land or any other reason and the us needs to keep its nose out of it we have enough of our own problems like new orleans and the gulf region to worry about. We have our troops scattered all over what about us what will happen if they hit here but the main thing is we should never take another life or be ordrered to

2006-07-24 07:48:49 · answer #2 · answered by bridgettemarie123@yahoo.com 3 · 0 0

Each situation is unique, and demands a unique response. It's possible for two peoples to both have a legitimate claim on a piece of land. How those claims are dealt with should depend partly on what one can reasonably expect to achieve. Israel isn't going anywhere, so anyone whose policy towards it involves a wish for its destruction is deceiving himself and compromising the hope for a lasting peace.

2006-07-24 09:34:28 · answer #3 · answered by Keither 3 · 0 0

You have a point there. It's a double standard of the west. Unfortunetly, Arabs are overall are weak. If they retailate, they are the one who are going to suffer more.

2006-07-24 07:47:49 · answer #4 · answered by NikeT 2 · 0 0

Your analogy is bad. Again.

You cannot justify killing people over land.

2006-07-24 10:45:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God u have to see this:
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-7828123714384920696

2006-07-24 07:44:57 · answer #6 · answered by Lolo Lovou 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers