please said NO. because irfan is my favourite CRICKETER.
2006-07-24 00:35:43 · 28 answers · asked by Prerna V 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Even a child says that the answer is NO.
An all-rounder is far better than a batsman or a bowler. As the work done by a all-rounder is no way equal to a batsman or bowler and it is higher than both the things.
See if Sreesanth fails in bowling (in a match) , he can do nothing but see the match. But if Pathan fails in Bowling, he can perform well in batting and vice versa. Also Pathan is a trump card for a captain that the captain can use him at any position and also Pathan is able to give the early break throughs which are very important for the team's confidance.
I am very upset as Pathan did not play most of the matches in the West Indies series.
Hope he will play in the upcomming series and crouch in the field like a tiger.
2006-07-24 04:16:16 · answer #1 · answered by Sherlock Holmes 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Comparing shreesanth and infran pathan is immposible. Ifran pathan is a kind of his own. He swings the ball, can bat well can bowl at about 125kmph. Shreesanth can bowl at 140 kmph. They are bowlers of diffrent kind. May be statistics can show who is better. But shreesanth does not have a great ststistics to support him.
Right now both are bowling well . Only when they finish there carreer will any body decide who is better. Based on who was able to maintain consistency through out there carreer. But as of now ifran pathan is in the lead to win the race between him and shreeshant.
2006-07-24 15:46:25 · answer #2 · answered by Immanuel Alwin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Never.
Irfan Pathan is experienced and has played in more matches and knows the situations. He can bowl better length & line.
Sreesanth came later and hasn't registered a good performance in tests than ODIs.
So overall it is 75:25
2006-07-24 02:14:08 · answer #3 · answered by DPC 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i don think so , irfan is certainly better as he is all rounder n if u talk abt only bowling then also irfan is better his line n legh is certainly better that the shreesanth's line , i agree that santh bowls wid more speed than irfan does but i don think that it makes any diifference if u don have line n lengh in ur bowling speed can't do anything
2006-07-24 04:08:07 · answer #4 · answered by himanshu a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. shreesanth is a new player. he is just gud for indian pitches. Overseas, he is non-guaranteed. As we seen in Windies. While Pathan did very well in Australia and Pakistan. He is just not in gud touch these days and also not getting gud support of chappel and may be dravid also.
2006-07-24 02:45:41 · answer #5 · answered by nirman doshi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pathan Is a good player. But the resnt performance analysis is better for s.santh than pathan
So I will give 75% for S.Santh
2006-07-24 05:13:10 · answer #6 · answered by Joe85 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No shreesanth is not better than irfan
2006-07-24 02:55:54 · answer #7 · answered by Dushu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well..i dont think there is no need to ask this question also..see Irfan is gud in both battin n bowlin..but ShreeSanth is just gud at bowlin so the answer is irfan is better than him
2006-07-24 01:43:03 · answer #8 · answered by *! ÐHÄRINI - † !*: 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well in my opinion Shreeshanth is more lethal than irfan but it is irfaen who takes the wickets when india desperatly need them
shreeshanth is more pacy and agressive than irfaen so i say they both r matched equally.
2006-07-24 01:02:39 · answer #9 · answered by shyam 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shreesanth may be a little quicker but to me pathan has better control.
2006-07-24 07:35:16 · answer #10 · answered by porkupuss 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋