I thought it was really good, I enjoyed it!
2006-07-23 23:10:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by C 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I mostly like Sci-Fi movies so going to see this movie was strange for me, but I sort like the fantastic "time gap" part of it. Keanu Reeves character, a Chicago architect with father issues, becomes involved with an emotionally isolated doctor played by Sandra Bullock. The hitch: She's living in 2006, while he goes about his lonely life in 2004. Even though the lack of romantic chemistry between these two letter-writing lovers separated by time and space can sometimes get annoying, I honestly felt I was watching one of those long The Twilight Zone episodes, and that was good.
2006-07-24 06:55:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ???*.Catarina.*??? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I saw it with my girlfriend and even though we did make out during the middle of it...It was weird and hard to follow.
The only reason I would go see it again is to have a full on make-out session through the whole movie.
=]
2006-07-24 06:12:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by I love this girl. 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's good but not great. Definitely worth a rent. Ebert and Roper gave it two thumbs up
2006-07-24 06:10:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jackal 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I saw it. I thought it was decent. Worth seeing maybe for a matinee or once it hits the cheaper theaters or maybe renting on DVD.
2006-07-24 06:11:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by ekaty84 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My sisters boss said and I quote " DO NOT GO SEE THAT MOVIE IT WAS HORRIBLE, IF YOU DO YOU'LL BE WAISTING YOUR MONEY. THE ENDING SUCKED, IT WAS JUST STUPID!!!!!"
So that's all I have to say on this topic.
2006-07-24 08:39:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by tre_wingo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah...its romantic story, not too bad.
2006-07-24 06:57:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by griffinswinsky 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll wait until the movie comes out on DVD before I see it, thanks for asking! :)
2006-07-24 06:13:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mike M. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
not yet? whats the big deal!
2006-07-24 06:11:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by nice guy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
downloading it now....
2006-07-24 08:33:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋