Since Delhi was under British control during 1857, Charles John Canning was the head of british rule in Delhi….Charles John Canning, known as Viscount Canning from 1837 to 1859, was an English statesman and Governor-General of India during the revolt of 1857.
Bahadur Shah II (1775-1862), was the last of the Mughal emperors in India. (and traditionally Delhi was the capital of Mughal empire) Although Bahadurshah was not a really a ruler at that time, The emperor was paid some respect and allowed a pension and authority to collect some taxes, and maintain a token force in Delhi by the British. He was exiled to Rangoon, Burma (now Yangon, Myanmar) in 1858 at the end of the revolt. Bahadur Shah died in exile on November 7, 1862 and is buried near Shwe Degon Pagoda, Rangoon.
2006-07-24 00:27:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by abacus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The mutiny of the Bengal army began on May 10, 1857, at Meerut, when Indian soldiers who had been placed in irons for refusing to accept new cartridges were rescued by their comrades. They shot the British officers and made for Delhi, 40 miles (64 kilometres) distant, where there were no British troops. The Indian garrison at Delhi joined them, and by the next nightfall they had secured the city and Mughal fort, proclaiming the aged titular Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah II, as their leader. There at a stroke was an army, a cause, and a national leader—the only Muslim who appealed to both Hindus and Muslims.
2006-07-25 10:39:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by mspentinum 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar
2006-07-24 05:59:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bahadur Shah Zafar
2006-07-25 07:39:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
bahadur shah, last mughal king
2006-07-24 06:21:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by pali@yahoo.com 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
bahadur shah
2006-07-24 05:57:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by nice guy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Lord Rippon.
2006-07-24 05:59:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by birla 2
·
0⤊
0⤋