who thinks australia needs to bring back the death penalty? should tax payers keep paying the bill for them to sit in jail?
2006-07-23 22:15:39 · 13 answers · asked by Gemma W 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
ps for people that think it shouldnt what about crimes where innocent children are murderd in cold blood for example poor 8 year old girl in perth a couple of months back?
2006-07-23 22:22:18 · update #1
NO. Death penalty is the most cruel and fundamentalistic action a government can take. It is disrespectful and disgusting. Tax payers can take pride in paying the bill for human and ethical punishement. What is not human and unethical is death penalty.
2006-07-23 22:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by Tones 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Death penalty should be reinstated because it prevents the commission of heinous crimes. It is the proper penalty for grave offenses instead of life imprisonment. Death penalty will come into play in the mind of a person who is intending to commit a crime. Thus, death penalty should be revived.
2006-07-23 22:24:40 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Killing them isn't exactly free, either. The death penalty really has no advantages at all. Except satisfying some bloodthirst, I suppose.
2006-07-23 22:21:30 · answer #3 · answered by ThePeter 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i imagine we are extra ideal without it... particular, lack of existence penalty will sparkling out some reformatory cells, particular someone like ivan milat merits the shortcoming of existence penalty.... yet i imagine a lack of existence sentence is a lot extra ideal... executing a criminal, is like permitting them to damage out with it.. they die, they stop suffering... the family individuals/ households they affected are nevertheless alive and suffering/ suffering... would not sound honest, does it? spending something else of your existence in reformatory is a lot extra ideal... enable the prisoner conflict through as she/ he slowly dies in reformatory.. enable them conflict through as a lot because the family individuals is... execution, is a standard damage out for the prisoner
2016-10-15 03:37:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
An eye for an eye only ends with the whole world being blind
2006-07-23 22:19:42 · answer #5 · answered by jonnygaijin 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
State sanctioned MURDER is wrong!!!
I would rather however, that my money pays for them to be rehabilitated - not just thrown in jail.
Besides, my tax dollar pays for roads I don't use - I use almost exclusively public transport. No one screams bloody murder for that.
2006-07-23 22:21:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i say yes if there is heaps of proof and a confession because some cases are so sad and grr those crims who murder and do horrible things but i dont think it will ever be put back in place
2006-07-24 00:27:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, I agree with completely.
2006-07-23 22:18:36 · answer #8 · answered by ScottyDoesntKnow 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I see an eye for an eye...
Whatever one does, I think he or she should have to do the same thing...
You drown someone, you drown
2006-07-23 22:19:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
you first as a test case.
2006-07-23 22:40:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋