Was it right? My Opinion:
My father has been living with MS for more than 5 years. Auto-immue diseases run in our family and stem cell research would really help. I took his veto very personall and frankly I'm pissed off. And to top things off, in CA we have I think 3 billion dollars that are supposed to be used for stem cell research under consideration in court. When did medical research every become an issue of morals? Letting someone die doesn't sound like following morals at all.
What are your opinons?
2006-07-23 20:31:59 · 9 answers · asked by curiousricol 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
As usual, Bush does as he likes. When he came to office he backtracked on all the Kyoto protocols which was being put in place by other developed countries to save the Earth.
Now he's vetoing stem cell research just because it against his beliefs.
He has never done anything that is of the best interests of the majority public. He has always in favour of the few that is close to him.
2006-07-23 20:49:59 · answer #1 · answered by Puzzled 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
George Bush vetoed federal investment for embryonic stem cellular analyze with the aid of fact this is faulty. Being in politics calls for understanding the version between suitable and incorrect, and because 2/3 of congress of course does not have this perception, Mr. Bush had to step forward. sick admit, he's finished issues i do no longer approve of in the previous, yet each baby-kisser has. despite if,l Mr. Bush is definitely on a challenge for God, this is why he does not supply a damn approximately his approval score. (He does not ought to situation approximately yet another election anyhow)
2016-10-08 06:23:19 · answer #2 · answered by marceau 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not about morals, it's about President Shrub trying to look good to the religious wackos.
Bush is trying to impose his religious beliefs on everyone. The bible thumpers are followers who do whatever the leader does, so it makes it easier for Bush to get away with what he's been doing in our name.
Whatever happened to separation of church and state? (And before some religious wacko says there's no such thing, try actually reading the entire constitution and bill of rights first...the first people in the English colonies were fleeing the religious impostions of the English king...trying to win freedom from another religion. The Founding Fathers of our nation wanted that to never happen in this country, yet it is happening.)
To all of the christians who think bush is some kind of godsend...how would you like it if someday in the near future, another president imposed his religion on the country, but it wasn't YOURS?
It's sad that Bushwacker used his vewwy fusst veto on something religion-driven. He should have been focusing on the good such research would do.
2006-07-23 20:45:11 · answer #3 · answered by RQ1227 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No it wasn't right because while Gov. of Texas he let hundreds die in prison death penalty.
But the reason he used was saying that all life is precious. That is being two-faced either save all lives or don't.
Murder is murder whether it's a cell or an evil adult. We should rise above.
2006-07-23 20:36:57 · answer #4 · answered by Man 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are 100% right!! There is alot that Stem Cell can do for alot of people...they have even said they can find more cures for Cancer....Bush was wrong in doing that...
2006-07-23 20:37:15 · answer #5 · answered by celine8388 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it was wrong,stem cell research can prevent and cure diseases its useful...i bet if one of bush's parents had a disease he would have had a second thought
2006-07-23 20:37:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the veto of the bill is stupid.because when it comes to war ,killing innocent people to successfully kill other people is a perfectly exceptional thing.but when it comes to saveing lives without taking anything he puts his foot down.Collateral damage is fine when your takeing lives..but not when your saveing them.Bush is a douche.Plane and simple.
2006-07-23 20:41:12 · answer #7 · answered by downtownwarriors 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't blame Mr Busch, he is our president and do fulfill the will of the voters who might have voted for him. It is called democracy.
2006-07-23 21:05:06 · answer #8 · answered by Realname: Robert Siikiniemi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Can you say Theocracy? Blame the "conservative Christians" for the utter stupidity of our president.
I believe in Christ but I also believe in separation of church and state so did our founding forefathers.
2006-07-23 20:51:01 · answer #9 · answered by john p 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋