which font has good in readablility except Bodoni, helvetica........plz suggest....
2006-07-23 19:57:22 · 13 answers · asked by d_ g 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Other - Visual Arts
Like Ken said, the serif fonts. Serif fonts are ranges from Century, Times New Roman, Bookman Old Style, Courier, Garamond, etc. Theoretically, this type has been proven by book psychologist on how effective it is for book readers.
Sans serif fonts like Arial and Century Gothic is a no-no to books but its good on screen, trust me.
2006-07-23 22:09:41 · answer #1 · answered by Spider-girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I don't even know what that is. But if you are making a book as in a keepsake then I cn help. : ) You can buy paper that allows you print the font onto it. Then place the paper with the printed side down on the book and scratch away. Some only require slight heating.
2016-03-27 04:44:22 · answer #2 · answered by Marie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
New Times Roman, 12 pitch
2006-07-23 20:02:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find Verdana to be a very pleasing, readable sans-serif font. It is modern and elegant without being stark.
I've written a few technical manuals with it, and my audience has liked the font. Its comfortable readable down to a 9pt size, but also looks good in heading sizes as well.
2006-07-24 04:29:57 · answer #4 · answered by nephil9 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It`s usually Times new roman.
2006-07-24 00:24:55 · answer #5 · answered by cassie d` mignon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well for book u have to use 12 for line and 14 for hader and use
times new roman bez its use in every book of madical ,eng ,com etc and bold and italic ur hader ok
2006-07-23 20:40:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any serif font
2006-07-23 20:00:29 · answer #7 · answered by Ken 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a manuscript. I use new times roman.
2006-07-23 20:00:44 · answer #8 · answered by lovely soul with insite 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NEW TIMES ROMAN...definately NOT courier
2006-07-24 11:48:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
times new roman..
simple is beautiful
2006-07-23 20:15:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋