I believe that honor goes to a Democrat: Lyndon Johnson.
2006-07-23 18:55:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
YES! 1.Truman, The Bombs on Japan, then moseying right on into Korea (for no other reason but to waste human lives) 2. JFK/LBJ, Vietnam was a FIASCO from the word gitgo, (same reason as #1). 3. Wilson, The Mustard Gas War, he must have been "high" on it to see a real reason to get involved. 4. FDR, that war was a necessity, the Japanese, gave US a black eye, so we needed to retaliate. As you can plainly see, none of the wars was ever deemed a good war (none of the wars were "cleanly" fought).
I remember reading, that someone wrote that "New Orleans" was Bush's fiasco! That person better go back and read the laws that were written to tie the hands of the President. The National Guard cannot be sent in until the Mayor asks the Governor, then the Governor has to declare a National Emergency, Then the President can act on the request!
2006-07-24 01:51:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ihatedems 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you going to be a college boy? wow! I have seen some of you on the news. If I go to college will I be brainwashed like you? dont they teach you to be thinkers or just repeat all the same dribble?would America still be standing if college grads had been running the show for the first 150 years of our country? I dont think we would have made it this far. dont worry, real men will save our country so you boys can keep smacking each others butts under the candle light.
2006-07-24 05:18:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by not coming back 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We haven't seen anything yet. If he keeps making policies that despoil the environment anymore in favor of big business, we could be looking at millions of people dying as global warming changes the entire planet. And if he doesn't straighten up, there may be a nuclear exchange -not looking forward to that! I think that he is the worst president ever!
2006-07-24 01:12:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on your definition. Is bombing civilians for the purpose of creating terror also murder, even if it's in the name of war? if it is, than President Roosevelt was a murderer. Over the objections of our allies, he authorized that the major of the bombs (50+%) dropped on Germany to be dropped on civilians, not the military.
2006-07-24 01:11:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i only recall one other pres. murdering anybody and that was his father so i would say yes by far he has murdered more people than any other president. i would say this is the most murder happy father and son combo in the history of this world. mabie not happy as in murder but happy in the profit murder = to them.
2006-07-24 01:24:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
By the time he completes his term, he would have murderd more than 2 Million people which puts Paul Pot of Cambodia to shame.
2006-07-24 02:27:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jad 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush a puppet to military? - he's gone against their every recommendation - and as far as saving our *** for centuries...how old are you??
It's not fair to say Bush murdered anyone - it's really just neglagent manslaughter
2006-07-24 01:23:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by ryandebraal 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is a puppet for the military that's been saving your *** for centuries.
2006-07-24 01:14:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by denbobway 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess the presidents of WW1 and WW2 still top him
2006-07-24 01:14:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Karim M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would probably be FDR because he "killed" all those Nazis, or "freedom fighters" as you would probably call them because they were "just defending themselves against our unjustified aggression".
Your stupidity is sickening, and hopefully you will soon face the agonizing death that you truly deserve.
2006-07-24 01:13:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by rusty shackleford 3
·
0⤊
0⤋